hide/disable the Recent Activity in the details pane
Implement a configurable switch to hide/disable the Recent Activity in the details pane. Should be configurable at the user, library or tenant level.
Users find it annoying when the details pane keeps refreshing as other users update a list item or document; it makes the details pane constantly refresh and appears to "flicker" causing a poor user experience.
Rob Barker
shared this idea
42 comments
-
Sean
commented
Has anyone tried to edit SharePoint page and remove the web part by using the trash icon?
-
Vik7898
commented
I'm more concerned about the links on the SharePoint start page.
Say a user is pregnant and wants to look at her organisation's maternity information, which is on a site that all staff can access. User opens a doc called 'Maternity Info for staff' and runs the risk of SharePoint announcing it to other users on the SharePoint start page.
This has got to be a breach of privacy. -
ccon xc
commented
2018-2021, it will not happen, right?
-
Anonymous
commented
I agree - this needs to go, some of the stuff we have on here is private. Please change this Microsoft.
-
Anonymous
commented
Same here, we are migrating to SharePoint and I know that this will be an unwelcome list. Any way to hide this panel without having to disable the library from the search as suggested in some links?
-
Anonymous
commented
Why is this still a function? It is totally inappropriate for my activity including file names to be broadcast to all users of our SharePoint.
-
Anonymous
commented
This is absolutely a must function. In addition to security concerns, there is also another important function where you can find a direct link to the element (folder/file) which can be found at the very bottom of side pane and copied easily - but if you have a lot of activities in 'Recent Activity' part it is almost impossible or very time consuming to scroll to the bottom of this list.
-
Brittney Trimmer
commented
Please add this functionality as it would be very useful.
-
Rahul K
commented
Needs to have an option to permanently disable or to improve the user experience can be rights managed.
-
Jonathan Elwell
commented
I just ran into this today, a client had users seeing activity in folders they don't have access to - even though they couldn't access the document itself, being able to see the document name is a major data access issue
-
Anonymous
commented
not having the ability to hide recent activity surely is a breach of GDPR. I can see what documents the MD is working on, and thats never a good thing
-
Anonymous
commented
this has to be an option - how its not seen as a breach of privacy i do not know...
-
anonymus
commented
Please give me the possibility to turn off the activity pane and remove alle the data that is mentioned in it.
-
Jon Zaid
commented
The details pane should be able to be hidden!!
-
Anonymous
commented
I wrote an app using sharepoint backend. Status of the record should always be updated by the system (flows) and every change is timestamped with datetime and who did it. Users are circumventing this by opening the details pane and changing the values. I cant enforce compliance
-
rosie richmond
commented
If you mean the Activity web part on the modern page, you can easily remove it from the page. Click “Edit” to edit the page > click the remove button to remove the webpart > publish the page to save the changes.
-
David
commented
This seems like a simple fix. Does Microsoft not know how to turn this off? I thought Microsoft listened to their customers.
-
Anonymous
commented
Please implement an option to disable this, we have patient data and other sensitive internal information, which filenames shouldn't be displayed to all people in the organization that are able to access Sharepoint.
The workaround to completely remove a document library from search (as pointed out here: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/msoffice/forum/msoffice_sharepoint/how-to-hide-sharepoint-online-activity-in-home/1ab2a702-36bd-4d4c-a5fd-0486dd8a0aba) is not a proper solution.
-
Amey Mulay
commented
I concur what Neil stated !
This is a security concern & we should be able to toggle it as & when required.
As it defeats the purpose of providing secured access.Regards,
AMEY -
Martin C
commented
