SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

SharePoint Dev Platform

Welcome! This is your place to suggest ideas or vote for ideas for improving the SharePoint Dev Platform.

How to submit a new idea

  1. Check if it's already been suggested. If it has, vote for it.
  2. If it's new, submit it in 50 words or less.
  3. Gather support!
  4. If your idea receives over 100 votes in 90 days, we will respond.
    If not, we will close it.

Want to engage further? Please visit the SharePoint Community

Note: we have partnered with UserVoice, a third-party service and your use of the portal and your submission is subject to the UserVoice Terms of Service & Privacy Policy, including the license terms. Please do not send any novel or patentable ideas, copyrighted materials, samples or demos for which you do not want to grant a license to Microsoft.

I suggest you ....

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Allow us to develop custom modern forms with custom edit experience

    We would like to be able to create an SPFx form and associate it with the List/Content type Disp, Edit, New form so that no matter how a user finds a list item (search, OOB list view, custom list view, etc) they see our custom form. Currently our only option is to create a completely disconnected experience in which we write a custom list view that points to custom form pages.

    Alternatively support field customizers with edit model to enable custom field editing experience.

    921 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Allow extending SharePoint Admin Center using SPFx

    It would be nice to have the ability to extend some of the functionality in the SharePoint Admin Center. Specifically, the ability to deploy SharePoint Framework Web Parts into the Admin Center (via an App Page?). Currently, the community builds lots of SPFx Web Parts to fill the gaps in the Modern UX.

    Such Web Parts include:
    Theme Manager
    Site Design Studio/Manager

    These are SPFx solutions that have been built to help better manage our environments through a UX experience (as there isn't one via First Party). It would be nice to have a centralized location where these SPFx solutions…

    159 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. SPFx Key/Value Pair Properties that support Read/Write

    Provide a SharePoint Framework mechanism/API that allows for Site or Site Collection Read/Write of Key/Value pair properties for use in SPFx related configuration and customizations. Similar to how the property bag was used in classic.

    One use case is for storing configurable properties or even user personalization configurations written and read by an SPFx solution.

    This is one of many uses cases that would make this feature valuable, so in addition to your vote, please feel free to comment with additional ways in which this feature could provide additional value.

    134 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    thinking about it  ·  3 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Add --nobuild flag to gulp serve

    Observed behavior
    ---------------------
    When using a monorepo manager, like for example @microsoft/rush, the rush build command bundles all projects which are referenced in the monorepo - including SPFx projects.
    When running gulp serve in (one of) the SPFx project(s), the bundle gulp command rebuilds the project. This is an unnecessary step, which would be nice if we could disable.

    Proposed solution
    --------------------
    Add a --nobuild flag support to the gulp serve command so we can start the local web server without rebuilding the SPFx code.

    80 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Extensions: Application Customizer get page all components data (List, Documents, Search etc..)

    Provide a way to get data about all components that present on page in ApplicationCustomizer like SearchBox, Search, Documents Library, Lists, Navigation bar etc.

    The idea is to have full control on user interaction with components.

    In example I want to make an additional action when user clicks on folder, file, list item, navigation item, search result item etc...

    Ideally to have access to domElement and data model of component.

    106 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Add modern webservice API functionality to supported API as graph

    There are two modern webservices used in SharePoint for getting followed sites, frequented sites, news posts, etc for the current user. As asked about on Github (https://github.com/SharePoint/sp-dev-docs/issues/1689) and as mentioned in this uservoice (https://sharepoint.uservoice.com/forums/329220-sharepoint-dev-platform/suggestions/34075903-api-support-for-followed-sties) a bunch of folks would like to have some kind of official support/usage for this. If this is not possible, we would like to ask to add these functions to Graph / SharePoint REST

    51 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  7. Add support to create list / document library based on custom template to REST API

    If I save list as template I cannot use this template to create new list via REST API because it does not accept template name as input parameter: This is possible in CSOM by passing ListTemplate parameter (https://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/255947/creating-a-document-library-from-custom-template-with-folder-structure-inside-us)

    In REST it is possible just to pass ListTemplateTypeKind as BaseTemplate parameter and there is no parameter for custom template name so it is not possible to create new list/library based on custom template (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/dev/sp-add-ins/working-with-lists-and-list-items-with-rest)

    41 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  8. Provide clear support statement for SPFx with IE

    Right now there is no clear statement regarding the supportability of IE with SPFx. Since IE 11 is still supported for O365 and SharePoint Online, customers assume that it is supported with IE as well.
    Currently SPFx is impossible to use with IE because of performance issues and very bad memory leaks in IE. The more content and web parts are on a modern page the worse it gets. Thus, I suggest that you either fix those issues, or make a clear statement that SPFx is not supported with IE anymore. This would really help customers in making their decisions.

    182 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Deactivate feature using site scripts and site designs.

    There is a verb to activate feature. Sometimes we require to deactivate features which are not required while creating sites. Can there be a separate verb for deactivating features? Also activateFeature but it works only at web level features. Can we have it extended to activate at site collection level?

    130 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Site Scripts & Site Designs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Allow Site Collection App Catalog location be configurable

    We live in a tenant where we have over 25 different companies. When it comes to customizing and supporting the tenant catalog is too broad, but the site collection catalog adds support nightmares with syncing and managing the apps and installs in each one. It would be great if the site collection admin could choose an additional Site Collection app catalog to pull from. This would allow for us to manage company specific apps in a Company site collection catalog much like the tenant catalog while still getting site specific catalog items from the site collection catalog. In this model,…

    53 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Create SPFx webparts inside or from another SPFx webpart or extension

    As described in https://github.com/SharePoint/sp-dev-docs/issues/3110

    Untill SPFx version 1.4.1 there was an option to use the ClientSideWebPartManager to create webparts from another webpart. Currently we are working some time already on a custom 'widgetzone' with an easy dragging and dropping grid layout (Muuri, https://haltu.github.io/muuri/), user zones and a lot of other awesome stuff which isn't supported by the default SharePoint grid. (which is off course understandable)

    Currently I am not seeing another path to make this possible, so for now we have to stick on the SPFx 1.4.1 release. I do understand this is something not many companies will encounter,…

    62 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. SPFx Webpart - Have custom group in Modern Pages

    Currently there are no ways we can have a group created for custom SPFx webparts developed. We have to use the existing groups mentioned here, https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/dev/spfx/web-parts/guidance/simplify-adding-web-parts-with-preconfigured-entries#predefined-modern-groups. Need to have ability to have custom groups for Webparts

    51 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. When creating an SPFx Extension for a custom header, provide a configurable property that allows the composite header to be hidden

    When developing a SharePoint Framework Extension to display a custom header and/or footer, the SharePoint Composite Header can be very redundant to the custom header.

    The Composite Header (css classname is 'ms-compositeHeader'), is what SharePoint provide out of the box and includes the square site logo, site name and navigation.

    When creating your own custom header that includes all of these things and possibly more, the existence of the Composite Header is redundant and can be confusing for users...(Ex: redundant navigation).

    While CSS can be used to hide this, such a technique is not playing within the rules of only…

    373 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Provide Support of SharePoint Hosted apps(add-ins) and add-in parts(Client Webparts) in SharePoint 2019 Modern sites/Modern Pages

    Provide Support of SharePoint Hosted apps(add-ins) and add-in parts(Client Web parts) in SharePoint 2019 Modern sites/Modern Pages. Same is supported in SharePoint Online but is not supported in SharePoint 2019 modern sites.

    33 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Add-ins  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Official documented Api needed to fetch modern Pages View count

    SharePoint modern pages Social bar View count apparently does not use Search Managed property ViewLifeTime or ViewsLifeTimeUniqueUsers. Fiddler traces shows that some Internal Apis are used to fetch modern pages social bar view count. It would great if Microsoft release Public documented API so that custom SPFx web parts/extension in need of modern page view count, could utilize the API

    58 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Documentation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Ability to deploy MS Flow Definition through .sppkg, similiar to how we can provision list and libraries.

    The deployment of SPFx components along with associated list and attached flow can be done with-in a single package so that minimum exclusive configuration is required for any developed solution.

    51 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Update SharePoint 2019 with the latest SPFx Drop

    Update SharePoint 2019 with the latest SPFx Drop. Most of the SharePoint Customers still have an OnPremises Farm. If you want customers to adopt this pattern it must be available in both environments. Staying on drop 1.4.1 in SP 2019 is the death of SPFx

    13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. API for "Create Team from Template" with Site Design

    We can do templating on SharePoint, through Site Designs and Site Scripts. We now also have the option to "Create a Microsoft Teams from Template".
    Unfortunately, both do not work together. We either have a templated SharePoint site with a generic Teams or a templated Teams with generic SharePoint site.

    I would love the possibility to combine both templating options. Preferrably with an API from day 1.
    This would give us an end to end templating scenario, where we can create preconfigured Teams with a preconfigured SharePoint site. (In the future, hopefully with a preconfigured Planner etc as well ;)…

    165 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  19. Create roledefinitions and groups from SiteDesign

    Please add functionality to create roledefinitions, create custom groups and assign roledefinitions to groups.

    11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Site Scripts & Site Designs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Add support of SharePoint Framework solution packages to the AppSource Store

    The latest adjustments in the Microsoft Store police allows store's add-in to works with conjunction with another add-in that is available only from the provider. The solution package (.sppkg) build with SharePoint framework is not classified as 'add-in'. Thus, we cannot add add-in in the Store that depend on SPFx solution and there is no way of delivering customizations to the modern page.
    I can offered two options for solving this issue: 1) Adjustment of point 4.18 (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office/dev/store/validation-policies#bk_4) from the Store policy to allows SPFx modifications 2) ApPSource store to start allowing .sppkg solution packages to be added

    260 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for your feedback! We’re reviewing your suggestion. We are absolutely looking into making this happen sooner or later, so that you can more easily distribute your customizations for Office 365 customers.

← Previous 1 3 4 5 14 15
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base