SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

SharePoint Dev Platform

Welcome! This is your place to suggest ideas or vote for ideas for improving the SharePoint Dev Platform.

How to submit a new idea

  1. Check if it's already been suggested. If it has, vote for it.
  2. If it's new, submit it in 50 words or less.
  3. Gather support!
  4. If your idea receives over 100 votes in 90 days, we will respond.
    If not, we will close it.

Want to engage further? Please visit the SharePoint Community

Note: we have partnered with UserVoice, a third-party service and your use of the portal and your submission is subject to the UserVoice Terms of Service & Privacy Policy, including the license terms. Please do not send any novel or patentable ideas, copyrighted materials, samples or demos for which you do not want to grant a license to Microsoft.

I suggest you ....

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Allow us to develop custom modern forms with custom edit experience

    We would like to be able to create an SPFx form and associate it with the List/Content type Disp, Edit, New form so that no matter how a user finds a list item (search, OOB list view, custom list view, etc) they see our custom form. Currently our only option is to create a completely disconnected experience in which we write a custom list view that points to custom form pages.

    Alternatively support field customizers with edit model to enable custom field editing experience.

    921 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. When creating an SPFx Extension for a custom header, provide a configurable property that allows the composite header to be hidden

    When developing a SharePoint Framework Extension to display a custom header and/or footer, the SharePoint Composite Header can be very redundant to the custom header.

    The Composite Header (css classname is 'ms-compositeHeader'), is what SharePoint provide out of the box and includes the square site logo, site name and navigation.

    When creating your own custom header that includes all of these things and possibly more, the existence of the Composite Header is redundant and can be confusing for users...(Ex: redundant navigation).

    While CSS can be used to hide this, such a technique is not playing within the rules of only…

    373 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Add support of SharePoint Framework solution packages to the AppSource Store

    The latest adjustments in the Microsoft Store police allows store's add-in to works with conjunction with another add-in that is available only from the provider. The solution package (.sppkg) build with SharePoint framework is not classified as 'add-in'. Thus, we cannot add add-in in the Store that depend on SPFx solution and there is no way of delivering customizations to the modern page.
    I can offered two options for solving this issue: 1) Adjustment of point 4.18 (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office/dev/store/validation-policies#bk_4) from the Store policy to allows SPFx modifications 2) ApPSource store to start allowing .sppkg solution packages to be added

    260 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for your feedback! We’re reviewing your suggestion. We are absolutely looking into making this happen sooner or later, so that you can more easily distribute your customizations for Office 365 customers.

  4. SharePoint 2016 On Premise _api/Web/Lists('listID')/subscriptions support (WebHooks)

    Please provide subscriptions API (_api/Web/Lists('listID')/subscriptions support (WebHooks)) SharePoint 2016 On-Premise which helps in webhooks, desktop notifications, mobile/push notifications and cross platform notifications to name a few.

    233 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  5. Provide the ability to write to Managed Metadata via app-only policy

    App-only policy in the SharePoint App Model is very restricted regarding Taxonomy operations. Even if an app is granted full control over the tenant, it lacks the permission to do anything but read operations on Taxonomy. Please provide the ability to create Groups, Term Sets and terms using app-only policy.

    198 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  6. Extensions: Property Pane / SideBar Placeholder (Right)

    Please provide a well-known placeholder for the property pane or better a similar placeholder that let us create a sidebar.

    Having this ability would let us create powerful sidebars/toolbox extensions. This would be a super cool enhancement!

    188 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Provide clear support statement for SPFx with IE

    Right now there is no clear statement regarding the supportability of IE with SPFx. Since IE 11 is still supported for O365 and SharePoint Online, customers assume that it is supported with IE as well.
    Currently SPFx is impossible to use with IE because of performance issues and very bad memory leaks in IE. The more content and web parts are on a modern page the worse it gets. Thus, I suggest that you either fix those issues, or make a clear statement that SPFx is not supported with IE anymore. This would really help customers in making their decisions.

    182 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Provide flag to enable\disable event firing from Remote Event Receivers

    Provide option to enable\disable event firing from Remote Event Receivers in SharePoint Online (CSOM/API) similar to SSOM - EventFiringEnabled

    178 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  9. API for "Create Team from Template" with Site Design

    We can do templating on SharePoint, through Site Designs and Site Scripts. We now also have the option to "Create a Microsoft Teams from Template".
    Unfortunately, both do not work together. We either have a templated SharePoint site with a generic Teams or a templated Teams with generic SharePoint site.

    I would love the possibility to combine both templating options. Preferrably with an API from day 1.
    This would give us an end to end templating scenario, where we can create preconfigured Teams with a preconfigured SharePoint site. (In the future, hopefully with a preconfigured Planner etc as well ;)…

    165 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  10. Line up list item pagination with REST API using $top and $skip

    Actually, the only way to paginate list items using the new REST APIs is to use __next property. There's no way to have a full working pagination using $top and $skip token as for any other REST call.
    See my comment here:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d4b5c277-ed50-420c-8a9b-860342284b72.aspx

    163 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  11. Allow extending SharePoint Admin Center using SPFx

    It would be nice to have the ability to extend some of the functionality in the SharePoint Admin Center. Specifically, the ability to deploy SharePoint Framework Web Parts into the Admin Center (via an App Page?). Currently, the community builds lots of SPFx Web Parts to fill the gaps in the Modern UX.

    Such Web Parts include:
    Theme Manager
    Site Design Studio/Manager

    These are SPFx solutions that have been built to help better manage our environments through a UX experience (as there isn't one via First Party). It would be nice to have a centralized location where these SPFx solutions…

    159 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Import XsltListViewWebPart definition

    It is actually possible to import the definition of a XsltListViewWebPart via LimitedWebPartManager in CSOM. However, not all properties are supported. Important properties like XmlDefinition, Toolbar, ViewStyle, .. are being ignored. There's no possibility to have everything set correctly not even manipulating the backed view after importing the WebPart. Please read also this discussion:
    http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/90433/add-document-library-xsltlistviewwebpart-using-csom-or-web-services

    158 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  13. Allow to use Office UI Fabric Icons and other fonts as Command Set icons

    It would be great if we are able to use font icons instead of url to images for Command Set extensions buttons icons.
    This allow 3d party extensions look more aligned with 1st party (same style, same icon color)

    145 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. SPFx Key/Value Pair Properties that support Read/Write

    Provide a SharePoint Framework mechanism/API that allows for Site or Site Collection Read/Write of Key/Value pair properties for use in SPFx related configuration and customizations. Similar to how the property bag was used in classic.

    One use case is for storing configurable properties or even user personalization configurations written and read by an SPFx solution.

    This is one of many uses cases that would make this feature valuable, so in addition to your vote, please feel free to comment with additional ways in which this feature could provide additional value.

    134 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    thinking about it  ·  3 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Improved API feedback around throttling

    Currently working with the API's for drive, graph, sharepoint are very difficult due to the throttling that can be encountered.

    Each api offers different guidance to avoid throttling. Example are:
    1) use a special user-agent header
    2) respect the retry-after header

    Speaking with microsoft representatives they instruct us to perform major api processing in off peak hours. Additionally tenant's can have hard locks placed on them.

    This request is to get better information around tenant usage returned in the API's.

    1) If a tenant is hard locked, tell us in a distinct message so that don't just hammer the requests…

    128 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  16. Enterprise Deployment of SharePoint Framework Apps in an On Premise Platform

    There is currently no good way to do enterprise level automated deployments of an SPFX addin into a SharePoint 2016 on Premise environment..

    Consider a case where there are 1000 site collections and we would need to deploy an SPFX app to all sites automatically. Currently there is no way to perform this deployment in an automated fashion. It is not possible through powershell, csom, c# or in an administrative UI.

    Having this ability would solve a large hole in capabilities with SharePoint Framework

    128 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Extensions: Application Customizer get page all components data (List, Documents, Search etc..)

    Provide a way to get data about all components that present on page in ApplicationCustomizer like SearchBox, Search, Documents Library, Lists, Navigation bar etc.

    The idea is to have full control on user interaction with components.

    In example I want to make an additional action when user clicks on folder, file, list item, navigation item, search result item etc...

    Ideally to have access to domElement and data model of component.

    106 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Fix CSOM SiteCollection Creation providing Lcid

    When creating Site Collections through CSOM and providing an LCID. (For example 2067) an exception is thrown.

    [Quote]
    SiteCreationProperties.Template\r\nParameter name: Specified value is not supported for the SiteCreationProperties.Template parameter." is thrown at ExecuteQuery();
    [/Quote]

    The Exception is also not pointing in the right direction.
    1) It should be possible to create Site Collections providing the LCID
    2) When an Invalid Lcid is passed, the exception should point in the right direction.

    93 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  19. Provide a means to do audience filtering for list items over REST APIs

    List items that have an Audience field attached should be audience filtered when retrieved via the REST API.

    For example, a list that has link items with the Audience field attached to target particular items at particular groups of people. If the REST APIs are used to retrieve items from this list, then the identity of the requesting user should be optionally used to filter the results based on audience.

    91 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  20. Add API that checks if user is in group

    Right now there is no API to check that. If you add a security group into a SharePoint group, there is no way to check if the current user is a part of the SharePoint group: The user is not listed in the group.Users and the SharePoint group is not listed in the user.Groups. The 3 APIs that allowed to do this in full trust code are missing from CSOM so we need an alternative.

    85 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
← Previous 1
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base