SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Jay

My feedback

  1. 390 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jay commented  · 

    Modern page layouts don't span the width of the window. Notice how they have a fixed width?

    Pretty terrible design Microsoft.

  2. 702 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    52 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jay supported this idea  · 
  3. 998 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  119 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jay supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,624 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    161 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jay supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,791 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    144 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jay supported this idea  · 
    Jay commented  · 

    Or dump the atrocious teams experience and consume SharePoint services as they were designed to be used...

  6. 1,267 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    149 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are continuing to make our large list experiences better, please keep the feedback coming.

    Spring 2018 update:
    - We now support being able to manually add indexes to lists of any size (increased from lists up to 20,000 items previously).
    - Starting with the February release of the Office 365 Excel client, you will be able to export your full list instead of getting cut off part of the way through.

    What we are working on now:
    - Predictive indexing will start to work for lists larger than 20,000 items so your views will automatically cause the right indexes to be added to your lists.

    In our backlog:
    - Being able to index/sort/filter by lookup column types (like person, lookup or managed metadata columns) without being throttled.
    - Making sure that our REST APIs support querying in ways that will guarantee that the call will not be throttled.

    For…

    Jay commented  · 

    This needs to be desperately addressed as a matter of priority. Throttling should not exist at all.

    Just profiling the SQL calls in order to return a single item is woefully sad. Throttle the speed of the services not the count if its so bad as its made out to be.

    Business I work with have lightening hardware supporting SQL service and were able to safely increase the limit to 500,000. Not a chance they will consider SPO until such a critical bottleneck is lifted.

    Jay supported this idea  · 
  7. 265 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    A consolidated admin view of where published content types are being used is still being evaluated, but for folks voting for the related use case of “better creation and management of content types” please refer to site designs (aka.ms/spsitedesigns) as a modern mechanism to create/apply content types to site libraries. We are also looking at how this could be more easily supported from hub sites.

    Jay commented  · 

    Well usage property already exists for site content types. It's certainly not hard to implement. I've written a migration script that uses this attribute to see where specific CT's are used then migrate them for various scenarios.

  8. 42 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  SharePoint Administration » Distributed Cache  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jay supported this idea  · 
  9. 145 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SharePoint Administration » Taxonomy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jay commented  · 

    dont forget content type. "Quick edit" (or after the fact metadat) does not allow you to change the content type.

  10. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jay shared this idea  · 
  11. 93 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SharePoint Administration » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jay supported this idea  · 
  12. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SharePoint Administration » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jay commented  · 

    My upvote is to align the product (SharePoint) licensing cost with the service (365) licensing cost. As it stands the only reason I can see is doing this is to drive customers away from their product and into alternatives such as OpenText, Drupal, Joomla etc. (wikipedia has a nice list to start evaluating alternative products)

  13. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SharePoint Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jay supported this idea  · 
  14. 234 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jay commented  · 

    Enable the filtering of search analytics to identify where people are searching from and filter our certain sources. For example our company uses the search web part to dynamically display content. As a result the search analytics is waaaay off and we are unable to find out how to better design our site because the analytics are so wrong. Search terms that are ranking high are only ranking high because of our page hits. It is invaluable to find out what people are really searching for. i.e. Only analytics from search page "XYX" as opposed to all search activity.

Feedback and Knowledge Base