SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

David

My feedback

  1. 65 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    David commented  · 

    I realistically don't see Microsoft doing this. They seem intent on driving more companies to adopt PowerApps and Flow where they charge for its use. However, if they want to drive companies to paying for Flow and PowerApps, they need to make both of the development tools for these much easier to use as you stated in your suggestion.

    David supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    David shared this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    David supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,141 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    174 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    In modern pages, we open links within SharePoint in the same tab by default, and external links in a new tab. In the text web part, users can specify to open links in a new tab, but that isn’t the default behavior. Similarly, for navigation links, they follow the same rule (within SharePoint, same tab, external to SharePoint in a new tab). This is true of the modern web parts that support linking as well (hero, quick links, images, etc.) This is the pattern we’ve adopted for consistency.

    After reviewing other areas of modern sites, like the site pages library, document libraries, lists, site contents, etc. we did find some different opening behaviors which we’ll review and resolve.

    Can you help us understand if this pattern isn’t meeting your expectation, if we have some inconsistencies within modern pages we’ve missed, or if it’s the other areas of modern sites where…

    David supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,888 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    148 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David supported this idea  · 
    David commented  · 

    Maybe Microsoft hasn't responded because they're confused by the description, while everyone else knows what the original person intended by this suggestion.

    If Microsoft is reading this feedback, the issue has to do with renaming a "Channel" in teams, which results in the corresponding SharePoint folder not being renamed. If you rename the folder in SharePoint to correspond to the updated channel name, when you click on the Open in SharePoint link, the link does not get updated and it says it cannot be found.

  6. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    David supported this idea  · 
  7. 38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David supported this idea  · 
    David commented  · 

    As others have said, InfoPath is so much easier and faster to use than PowerApps, especially when combined with the power of SharePoint Designer workflows. Unless you make PowerApps and FLOW much easier to use (and reliable), you need to maintain support for InfoPath and Designer Workflows as many organizations have built critical applications around the use of these two tools.

    It takes an enormous amount of effort to transform an existing solution to the newer tools. If Microsoft is "moving the ball forward," it shouldn't take more effort to build a solution using modern tools than it does with tools you are retiring.

  8. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Suggestion Archive  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David shared this idea  · 
  9. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Suggestion Archive  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David shared this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    David shared this idea  · 
  11. 62 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Suggestion Archive  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David shared this idea  · 
  13. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Suggestion Archive  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David commented  · 

    I would expand this to include creating a new number format where you can exclude the thousand separator, and you can also specify a number of leading zeros (similar to how you can specify the number of digits displayed after the comma). Leading zeros in a field are useful in so many ways, but especially for a ZIP code field where a leading zero is valid.

  14. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David supported this idea  · 
  15. 571 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David commented  · 

    Can someone explain what the issue is here? I am using Win 10, IE11 and SharePoint 2013 OnPremises and I have no trouble logging into SharePoint as a different user. If you have a shortcut to IE on your desktop, just [Shift]+[Right-click] and choose "Run as different user." Is it a problem with SharePoint online?

  16. 31 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  17. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David supported this idea  · 
    David shared this idea  · 
  18. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Administration » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David supported this idea  · 
  19. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SharePoint Administration » SharePoint Upgrade  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David supported this idea  · 
    David commented  · 

    The additional problem with "Manage files with no checked in version" is that if the document library contains more than 5,000 items, you can only use this feature during the large query window (if someone has a way around that, let me know). So being able to allow an admin to do a force check-in would be very useful on large document libraries.

  20. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    David commented  · 

    I'll add on to this idea. It would be nice if you could group the site contents page items by the type of app just like you can create views on lists and libraries that are grouped. Like in the example above, when you have a lot of apps on a site, it becomes difficult to find what you're looking for. If they were grouped by type, it would make finding items much easier especially if you could use filters and sorting options.

    David supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base