SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Pablo

My feedback

  1. 584 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    86 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Pablo commented  · 

    What about communication sites? Those are seen by many people in the organization, and there are several events that are recurring.
    If we want to add a calendar that supports recurring events we then need to create a group *per calendar* (as the calendar web part does not support multiple calendars).

    Pablo supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Pablo commented  · 

    Why so many webparts are missing basic functionality? I guess the urgency to have a web part "out there" trumps everything else!
    Modern sites is a half-assed product at best

  2. 139 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Pablo supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,071 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    69 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Pablo supported this idea  · 
  4. 550 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    30 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Pablo supported this idea  · 
  5. 319 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  SharePoint Administration » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for making this suggestion. We don’t currently have plans to implement this, but would love to better understand the scenarios and need.

    Do you expect that people are deleting pages, or changing pages/content names frequently enough that they’re breaking other pages/content without knowing it?
    Is the site owner responsible for fixing that content or the authors/editors moving the content around?

    Pablo supported this idea  · 
  6. 164 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Pablo commented  · 

    Robert: Can you list the SR? I would like to bring this to the MS support agent dealing with this issue.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Pablo commented  · 

    MS keeps saying this has been "implemented as designed", instead of admitting this is a bug. This is not the functionality present in libraries - only in the half-cooked "modern" ones, and only after mid-June, 2017. Previously, "modern" libraries used to show only the terms present in the documents included in the library.

    Pablo supported this idea  · 
  7. 337 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    A consolidated admin view of where published content types are being used is still being evaluated, but for folks voting for the related use case of “better creation and management of content types” please refer to site designs (aka.ms/spsitedesigns) as a modern mechanism to create/apply content types to site libraries. We are also looking at how this could be more easily supported from hub sites.

    Pablo supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base