SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Tom Braman

My feedback

  1. 673 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    75 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for submitting this suggestion and voting on it. We have two events/calendar solutions in modern pages today. The events web part has card based event tiles, powered by events lists. You can roll-up events from multiple sites into one page, but there isn’t currently a wall calendar view.

    Alternatively you can select to leverage a group calendar, and pull all of your events (including recurring events) from Exchange. This too is a compact card based view.

    While we understand a wall calendar view is desirable, we’re not working on it at this time.

    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  2. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  3. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  4. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  5. 504 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    36 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for everyone’s feedback around the use of white space on modern pages. We are continually looking for ways to refine our designs and the use of white space is an important part of this. While the custom control of sections or the custom control of columns is not likely to happen, there could be other optimizations we will be thinking about in the future. Thank you.

    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  7. 24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Braman commented  · 

    Tracy: Are you suggesting that List and Library Web Parts on Modern Pages should be able to appear in non-default Views? If so, I couldn't agree more. I have a list of related events that I want to post twice on the same page: Once to include upcoming events, and a second time to include past events. The Modern Page's List and Library Web Parts cannot handle that (unlike Classic). If I'm understanding you correctly, this needs a zillion more upvotes. - tom

  8. 1,439 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    thinking about it  ·  44 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  9. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Braman commented  · 
  10. 58 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Braman commented  · 

    Please vote for this suggestion at https://sharepoint.uservoice.com/forums/329214-sites-and-collaboration/suggestions/35931814-file-lock-override (same issue, but with more votes than this one)

  11. 182 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  12. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  13. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  14. 45 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Braman commented  · 

    Microsoft needs to reconsider the ill-advised decision to enforce "Recent" and "Pages" links in Quick Launch and Current Navigation. What was MS thinking? The classic-page workaround is to use audience targeting with a group that contains nobody (I create _Nobody groups in every collection by default these days, just for this purpose). However, that workaround doesn't work on a Modern Page. So, for the love of sanity, eliminate this 'feature' or at least give users the ability (per this suggestion) to disable it, ideally across an entire tenancy or, barring that, each collection.

    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  15. 584 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    86 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  16. 793 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    107 comments  ·  SharePoint Administration » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  17. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman shared this idea  · 
  18. 334 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  19. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Tom Braman supported this idea  · 
  20. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Braman commented  · 

    I just noticed that this request is being addressed by Microsoft per another request. See https://sharepoint.uservoice.com/forums/329214-sites-and-collaboration/suggestions/15255873-optimize-access-request-settings-for-site-owners

    I'm moving my vote over there...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Braman commented  · 

    Agree fully with Eric. The whole access request process needs attention. We use it only so end users can request access, and instead do all permissions via the Site Permissions page (/_layouts/15/user.aspx). That creates a mess of pending requests and external-user invitations on the Access Requests page (/Access%20Requests/pendingreq.aspx) that we just leave alone to expire (accepting them would often put users in the wrong groups; declining them would send the wrong message because we are actually 'accepting' them by granting access via the Site Permissions page.

    I'd love to know if/when Microsoft decides to prioritize this, as I could provide a number of real-world problems with the current interface and at least an equal number of solutions that would make it useful for end users, including site owners.

← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base