SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Thomas Bak

My feedback

  1. 363 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    40 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  3. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Publishing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  4. 221 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  5. 52 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  6. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  7. 163 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    23 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  8. 109 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  9. 773 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    127 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback. It would helpful to know the specific scenarios where users aren’t able to get to the content they need.

    We’ve observed that with sites shared publicly, or sites attached to a public Office365 Group, it’s not very meaningful to see every SharePoint Site a user can access, because there could be a huge number, most of which the user isn’t interested in.

    Is the focus here more like “show me all sites I’m a member of”?

    There is one comment that says search isn’t working, please open a support ticket for that.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Thomas Bak commented  · 

    As a user I would want a way to see:

    - All sites that I have access to (private, public, through "Everyone except external users" etc., i.e. any site I can access if I have the URL

    - All sites where I have been granted access directly, either by being a member of one of the O365 or SharePoint Groups that have access to the site (Owners, Members, Visitors or custom groups) or by having specific permissions

    - All sites where I am an owner, either by being directly in the SharePoint Owners group or by being in the O365 Owners group

    - All sites where I have Site Collection Administration permissions (essentially the same as above for group-connected sites but for classic sites there's still a difference)

    I imagine a page reachable from the SharePoint root with a table structure allowing both filtering and sorting. Columns would include but not be limited to:

    - Site name
    - Site URL (linked)
    - Site description
    - Private/Public (for group-connected sites)
    - Owners (resolved to users for O365 groups)

    I.e. along the same lines as the Active Sites list in the admin center but more focused on the end user.

    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  10. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SharePoint Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  11. 96 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Metadata  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  12. 679 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  13. 179 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  14. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  15. 42 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  16. 112 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  17. 203 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  18. 1,768 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    299 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    In modern pages, we open links within SharePoint in the same tab by default, and external links in a new tab. In the text web part, users can specify to open links in a new tab, but that isn’t the default behavior. Similarly, for navigation links, they follow the same rule (within SharePoint, same tab, external to SharePoint in a new tab). This is true of the modern web parts that support linking as well (hero, quick links, images, etc.) This is the pattern we’ve adopted for consistency.

    After reviewing other areas of modern sites, like the site pages library, document libraries, lists, site contents, etc. we did find some different opening behaviors which we’ll review and resolve.

    Can you help us understand if this pattern isn’t meeting your expectation, if we have some inconsistencies within modern pages we’ve missed, or if it’s the other areas of modern sites where…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Thomas Bak commented  · 

    The pattern you describe in your most recent follow-up is in line with what I’d expect and should be the consistent experience. Clicking on a site page from a library should not open that page in a new tab.

    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  19. 1,032 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    100 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This request is still in our web part backlog, but we’d love some more information. As some replies to this request have pointed out, when hovering over a person in SharePoint, Teams, or Outlook, you do see an Org Chart displayed. When we’ve spoken with customers in the past, our feeling was that more customization was required to display this on a page. Help us understand your needs. If we gave you the option to display this auto generated Org Chart on a page, with no customization options is that enough? If not, what customizations do you need? E.g. I need to be able to hide some of the people in the team, even though they’re in AAD. I need to rearrange and put some people in different physical locations on the layout to show their relationships better. I need to change their title from what’s in AAD,…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Thomas Bak commented  · 

    I’d like to see an initially basic web part with just a few settings:
    - Name of person on level 1 in the org chart
    - No. of levels to display
    - Allow navigation (switch)

    When navigation in org chart is allowed the users can navigate up and down in the org chart the same way it’s possible in the people cards.

    The use case would primarily be to display this on department pages or similar.

    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
  20. 836 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    145 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Thomas Bak supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base