SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Jace Copier

My feedback

  1. 339 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    50 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jace Copier commented  · 

    While group calendars may work, group sites are not the norm. Many sites are not group enabled, thus the solution will not work. This decision leaves a void for the majority of sites, not the minority.

    Jace Copier commented  · 

    Use Case: Every tuesday, the same training event occurs. each time, different employees will attend the event. I need the ability to re-create this event every week for the majority of the year. I do not wish to create this for the entire year. Please allow the modern events list to create repeated events to save me an exponential amount of time

    Jace Copier supported this idea  · 
  2. 440 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    91 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jace Copier commented  · 

    Remove the max-width, or increase the max-width limitation to the section of the page which holds the webparts. Most monitors are upgrading to 4k monitors and the max-width limitation is confusing. Allow the webpart sections to be more responsive for larger screens. Instead of floating the columns left. Allow the to flex and justify space between. This will spread out the white space, allow the webpart sections breathing room and get rid of the wasted white space on the right.

    Jace Copier commented  · 

    Please incorporate a full width webpart and allow the sections to have breathing room. Pages become very heavy to the left, especially on widescreen monitors where the right of the page is empty. Communication site layouts are much better in that manner. I don't believe the layout should be a communication only setting.

    Jace Copier supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jace Copier shared this idea  · 
  4. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Site owners can organize news posts for placement in news web parts today. This capability was added to meet the need of “pushing” older content to the top, or ensuring a particular news post stays in place while other news posts automatically feed into the system. This works in all layouts, and news source configurations. We’re working on scheduling posts/pages for publication right now, but it likely won’t include an “expiration” date at launch as newer content naturally pushes out older content (that isn’t placed in a specific news slot). If this doesn’t meet your needs, we’d love to better understand the scenarios that require expiration dates. Thanks

    Jace Copier commented  · 

    This is exactly what we need. I would also stress the ability to bump old news articles to the top. 3 cases:

    1. Communications team is prepping announce something very exciting to the company. Employees are able to search through pages and steal communications thunder. Make News private until go live date.

    2. Some news is time sensitive and it no longer relevant after a certain date. allow the news to disappear without the work of deleting a page

    3. Some news is re-occurring and to have the items surface back to the top, a new news article needs to be created. allow news articles to be re-published as new news.

    Jace Copier supported this idea  · 
  5. 24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jace Copier commented  · 

    The page looks good on a regular laptop monitor, but many modern monitors are increasing pixel density. 2k, 4k, or even 8k monitors are in the market. These site pages look strange on newer monitors with everything crammed to the left of the browser and so much white space to the right of it. Please re-think the layout of these modern pages to provide a better experience for these high resolution screens

    Jace Copier supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jace Copier shared this idea  · 
  7. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jace Copier shared this idea  · 
  8. 24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jace Copier shared this idea  · 
  9. 1,254 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    204 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    In modern pages, we open links within SharePoint in the same tab by default, and external links in a new tab. In the text web part, users can specify to open links in a new tab, but that isn’t the default behavior. Similarly, for navigation links, they follow the same rule (within SharePoint, same tab, external to SharePoint in a new tab). This is true of the modern web parts that support linking as well (hero, quick links, images, etc.) This is the pattern we’ve adopted for consistency.

    After reviewing other areas of modern sites, like the site pages library, document libraries, lists, site contents, etc. we did find some different opening behaviors which we’ll review and resolve.

    Can you help us understand if this pattern isn’t meeting your expectation, if we have some inconsistencies within modern pages we’ve missed, or if it’s the other areas of modern sites where…

    Jace Copier supported this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jace Copier shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base