SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Neil P.

My feedback

  1. 42 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Neil P. supported this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil P. supported this idea  · 
  3. 2,322 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    236 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are continuing to make our large list experiences better, please keep the feedback coming.

    Spring 2018 update:
    - We now support being able to manually add indexes to lists of any size (increased from lists up to 20,000 items previously).
    - Starting with the February release of the Office 365 Excel client, you will be able to export your full list instead of getting cut off part of the way through.

    What we are working on now:
    - Predictive indexing will start to work for lists larger than 20,000 items so your views will automatically cause the right indexes to be added to your lists.

    In our backlog:
    - Being able to index/sort/filter by lookup column types (like person, lookup or managed metadata columns) without being throttled.
    - Making sure that our REST APIs support querying in ways that will guarantee that the call will not be throttled.

    For…

    Neil P. supported this idea  · 
  4. 49 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Neil P. commented  · 

    As an SCA on many SharePoint sites, I can say from experience that this is a big problem! This behavior makes Swiss cheese out of a site's permissions scheme.

    Most users think that "Copy Link"/"Get a Link" provides a conventional, path-based URL to a document. They do not realize that instead they are getting a re-shareable link that any recipient can use to edit the target document.

    Links that override site permissions should ONLY be offered by the "Share" option. "Share" implies that an accommodation would be made to facilitate access. "Get a link" does not.

    Neil P. supported this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil P. shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base