SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

A.Z.

My feedback

  1. 47 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A.Z. supported this idea  · 
  2. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SharePoint Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A.Z. supported this idea  · 
  3. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SharePoint Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A.Z. commented  · 

    But be sure to not implement a hard cap Limit, cause with no pagination in combination with a hard cap Limit of items shown, People are not able to see/find all Content.

  4. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SharePoint Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A.Z. supported this idea  · 
  5. 44 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  SharePoint Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A.Z. supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A.Z. commented  · 

    Multiling. Term Store Search for SharePoint Online, too, please!

  6. 213 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  SharePoint Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A.Z. supported this idea  · 
  7. 348 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    A consolidated admin view of where published content types are being used is still being evaluated, but for folks voting for the related use case of “better creation and management of content types” please refer to site designs (aka.ms/spsitedesigns) as a modern mechanism to create/apply content types to site libraries. We are also looking at how this could be more easily supported from hub sites.

    A.Z. supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A.Z. commented  · 

    Hi there! I am so interested in updates to "better creation and Management of Content types", too! Pls share!

  8. 68 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A.Z. shared this idea  · 
  9. 43 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A.Z. supported this idea  · 
  10. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A.Z. shared this idea  · 
  11. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A.Z. supported this idea  · 
  12. 27 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A.Z. supported this idea  · 
  13. 243 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  SharePoint Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    A.Z. supported this idea  · 
  14. 85 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    in the plans  ·  5 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A.Z. commented  · 

    The highlighted content Webpart (HCWP) in SP-Online lacks some functionality which was very useful for building top-notch search-driven intranets in SharePoint On-Premise with the use of the CSWP.
    Please enhance the HCWP with the following functionalities:
    1. Possibility to enter audiences (target audience). This info is then used to "steer" which audience can see the Webpart on the page. Example: If I provide the audience "back office worker" in the HCWP, then only those people in the "back office worker audience" can see the webpart on the page, and the "frontline" workers won´t see the webpart on the page.
    2. Possibility to not only do an "or"-"chain" refinement, but to use a combination of "and" and "or" refiners. Example: Highlight Content with Metadata (Managed Property/MP) Year ["2016" or "2017"] and MP Subject "NDA"
    With above and/or combination, the HCWP would show all Docs with the managed Property "NDA" from Year 2016 and 2017, but not from Year 2015 (and so on) and no other Docs with another subject like... i.e. "user manual". It should be possible to "chain" and "group" those and/or connections in Blocks. So something like Show Documents with MP Year ["2016" or "2017"] and MP Subject ["NDA" or "User manual"] would be possible
    MP Year ["2016" or "2017"] and MP Subject "NDA" and MP Location "Los Angeles" would be possible
    and so on.
    Such statements are currently not possible to build.

    A.Z. supported this idea  · 
  15. 122 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A.Z. commented  · 

    Trying to give more detail ;) :

    People Webpart in edit mode:

    Section where you would be able to do a retrievel of people by department:
    Department-> equals/not equals/contains->Project Management/empty(department will not be used for retrieval)

    and a second section in Edit Mode underneath Department with "ask me about":
    "ask me about"->equals/not equals/contains -> and/or selection for checkboxes->(checkboxes generated by "ask me about" fields) Intranet, Yammer, Teams, SharePoint, Sales

    A.Z. shared this idea  · 
  16. 6,058 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    761 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are continuing to validate this long-awaited feature in a Private Preview Program with a subset of customers. Although feedback has been very positive we have identified a few things that we still need to address before we start making this more generally available. We appreciate that this is taking time, however providing a consistent user experience across M365 that continues to function as expected is a complex problem. We will provide another update within the next few months.

  17. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    A.Z. supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base