SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Tom Burke

My feedback

  1. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  2. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  3. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  5. 69 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  6. 173 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  7. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,672 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    288 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    In modern pages, we open links within SharePoint in the same tab by default, and external links in a new tab. In the text web part, users can specify to open links in a new tab, but that isn’t the default behavior. Similarly, for navigation links, they follow the same rule (within SharePoint, same tab, external to SharePoint in a new tab). This is true of the modern web parts that support linking as well (hero, quick links, images, etc.) This is the pattern we’ve adopted for consistency.

    After reviewing other areas of modern sites, like the site pages library, document libraries, lists, site contents, etc. we did find some different opening behaviors which we’ll review and resolve.

    Can you help us understand if this pattern isn’t meeting your expectation, if we have some inconsistencies within modern pages we’ve missed, or if it’s the other areas of modern sites where…

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  9. 209 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    We should be able to select ANY column on the list content types or ANY list column to display in the HCWP. The current capabilities are extremely limited and aren't ready for us to roll out production solutions yet.

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  10. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  11. 295 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Hub Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  12. 1,080 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    189 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    It's important to have audience targeting enabled *for the web part itself*, not just the content within it. Related post:

    https://sharepoint.uservoice.com/forums/329214-sites-and-collaboration/suggestions/34875403-in-a-modern-page-target-web-parts-so-that-only-de

    We often show/hide whole web parts based on the audience targeting features in Classic. Microsoft has stated it wants to bring most Classic features into Modern to reduce barriers to migration, please make this one of them!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    Enabling audience targeting of the whole web part on the following:

    * Quick Links
    * Text
    * Link
    * Embed
    * Document Library
    * O365 Video

    ...would be very beneficial to our migration path.

    Does the "Working On It" note mean:
    * audience targeting for visibility of the WHOLE web part?
    * respecting audience targeting settings on the individual LIST ITEMS you're pulling, e.g., via a HCWP or Events web part?

    Nuances are important--please be clear on what you're enabling!

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  13. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  14. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    For Classic sites that are coming into Modern via the automatic changes, we need better synergy between the experiences. A *big* part of this is what Tyler mentions above about switching into Classic mode when hitting system pages, and conversely switching to Modern when hitting Library and List pages. It's disjointed and off-putting.

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  15. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  16. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    Just HTML even. I know MS doesn't want to go back to the Script Editor and handle JS parsing, but at least give us some more control over how our content is rendered. The modern web parts are too piecemeal: for instance, why can't I embed a button into a table or link list? Everything is separate, with lots of space in between and no way to create content that other CMSs could handle easily--like tables with embedded images and imagemaps.

  17. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  18. 350 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    38 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks you for the suggestion. We’ve discussed adding additional column layout options (e.g. 4 columns, the specific example provided by the initial suggester 25/50/25, etc.) If we wanted to keep pages consistent (so there aren’t 50 layouts), but allow additional flexibility, what would be the next three layout choices you’d add? Thanks!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    To respond to MS's response to this, it's not about what layout choices are provided, it's about being able to specify the actual widths of the columns ourselves, e.g.: "10%, 15%, 50%, 25%". Responsive design is important but sometimes these kinds of customizations are necessary, especially given the excessive whitespace in Modern pages.

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  19. 423 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    29 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for everyone’s feedback around the use of white space on modern pages. We are continually looking for ways to refine our designs and the use of white space is an important part of this. While the custom control of sections or the custom control of columns is not likely to happen, there could be other optimizations we will be thinking about in the future. Thank you.

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  20. 359 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6

Feedback and Knowledge Base