SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Tom Burke

My feedback

  1. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  2. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  3. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  4. 76 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  5. 186 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  6. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,858 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    321 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    In modern pages, we open links within SharePoint in the same tab by default, and external links in a new tab. In the text web part, users can specify to open links in a new tab, but that isn’t the default behavior. Similarly, for navigation links, they follow the same rule (within SharePoint, same tab, external to SharePoint in a new tab). This is true of the modern web parts that support linking as well (hero, quick links, images, etc.) This is the pattern we’ve adopted for consistency.

    After reviewing other areas of modern sites, like the site pages library, document libraries, lists, site contents, etc. we did find some different opening behaviors which we’ll review and resolve.

    Can you help us understand if this pattern isn’t meeting your expectation, if we have some inconsistencies within modern pages we’ve missed, or if it’s the other areas of modern sites where…

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  8. 306 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    34 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    We should be able to select ANY column on the list content types or ANY list column to display in the HCWP. The current capabilities are extremely limited and aren't ready for us to roll out production solutions yet.

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  9. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  10. 369 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    32 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Hub Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  11. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  12. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    For Classic sites that are coming into Modern via the automatic changes, we need better synergy between the experiences. A *big* part of this is what Tyler mentions above about switching into Classic mode when hitting system pages, and conversely switching to Modern when hitting Library and List pages. It's disjointed and off-putting.

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  13. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  14. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    Just HTML even. I know MS doesn't want to go back to the Script Editor and handle JS parsing, but at least give us some more control over how our content is rendered. The modern web parts are too piecemeal: for instance, why can't I embed a button into a table or link list? Everything is separate, with lots of space in between and no way to create content that other CMSs could handle easily--like tables with embedded images and imagemaps.

  15. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  16. 433 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    54 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks you for the suggestion. We’ve discussed adding additional column layout options (e.g. 4 columns, the specific example provided by the initial suggester 25/50/25, etc.) If we wanted to keep pages consistent (so there aren’t 50 layouts), but allow additional flexibility, what would be the next three layout choices you’d add? Thanks!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    To respond to MS's response to this, it's not about what layout choices are provided, it's about being able to specify the actual widths of the columns ourselves, e.g.: "10%, 15%, 50%, 25%". Responsive design is important but sometimes these kinds of customizations are necessary, especially given the excessive whitespace in Modern pages.

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  17. 537 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    39 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for everyone’s feedback around the use of white space on modern pages. We are continually looking for ways to refine our designs and the use of white space is an important part of this. While the custom control of sections or the custom control of columns is not likely to happen, there could be other optimizations we will be thinking about in the future. Thank you.

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  18. 528 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    37 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  19. 806 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    in the plans  ·  49 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
  20. 719 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    83 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for submitting this suggestion and voting on it. We have two events/calendar solutions in modern pages today. The events web part has card based event tiles, powered by events lists. You can roll-up events from multiple sites into one page, but there isn’t currently a wall calendar view.

    Alternatively you can select to leverage a group calendar, and pull all of your events (including recurring events) from Exchange. This too is a compact card based view.

    While we understand a wall calendar view is desirable, we’re not working on it at this time.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    https://sharepoint.uservoice.com/forums/329214-sites-and-collaboration/suggestions/33231985-month-view-for-calendar-on-the-page

    That one above is marked Thinking About It. Please clarify which is the real/latest response, thanks!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    See previous comments that are screaming for this functionality.

    I've managed the development of calendar apps. I know they're not easy to make from scratch. But please reconsider--and alongside the suggestions below, please enable dynamic filtering of calendar events by any SharePoint column. For instance, if I select a Managed Metadata column called Category to filter on, the calendar view includes a dropdown menu. When values are selected, it shows only events that match the criteria. This is something we had to hack together with JavaScript and would love an OOTB, stable solution.

    Custom color coding would also be great. And, a more flexible view to show event cards within the Month view so they don't get so squished and unreadable--like expanding a card when hovering over it to show the full summary of the card.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tom Burke commented  · 

    The calendar needs an overhaul.

    * Native filtering by columns, e.g., via dropdown.
    * A much better way to navigate calendar overlays. Context should be retained when you switch among overlays so that you can go back to the last one you were viewing.
    * A better way of displaying lots of events inside a single day block, without relying so much on the "More" link.
    * Total customization of the data you can place onto an event block: i.e., first and second lines should display whatever columns you want them to.
    * Of course, a robust mobile format that supports the above.

    Tom Burke supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5

Feedback and Knowledge Base