SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Joel Chmiel

My feedback

  1. 354 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Joel Chmiel supported this idea  · 
  2. 593 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    thinking about it  ·  24 comments  ·  SharePoint Mobile App for iOS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel Chmiel supported this idea  · 
  3. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel Chmiel supported this idea  · 
  4. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Dev Platform » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel Chmiel supported this idea  · 
  5. 4,131 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    374 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joel Chmiel supported this idea  · 
  6. 164 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joel Chmiel commented  · 

    I'm working with a client on a library now and we're running into this. We're trying to move to modern, but this is a big deal / potential dealbreaker.

    While things have improved...we now receive back the first 140 parent terms. (I don't know if that's because there's some children terms or if 140 is the new limit.) It's still very frustrating that there's no way to bring back more terms. It makes the field unusable for filtering.

    Ideas:
    - Add a text box at the top of this filter to allow for manually bringing back a subset of terms starting with whatever is typed.
    - Add a next button to "page" through terms...which could make a call back to the term set, thus reducing the size of each query (assuming that's the real reason there's an arbitrary limit).

    In any case, this worked in classic with "Key Filters", but doesn't in modern. It's a real issue for users trying to move to modern. In this case, the term set has about 300 terms, so it's not huge, but we simply cannot use it for filtering. In another library, there's a term set with more and we'll have the same problem.

    Joel Chmiel supported this idea  · 
  7. 5,755 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    720 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Providing the ability to scale from renaming individual sites, to all sites within a SharePoint tenant, while ensuring a consistent user experience across M365 is a complex problem. We have been working hard on this long-awaited feature and are currently validating this with a subset of customers in a closed (no longer accepting nominations) Private Preview Program. As we consolidate their feedback, we will provide another update in the next few months.

    Joel Chmiel supported this idea  · 
  8. 420 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Joel Chmiel supported this idea  · 
  9. 1,170 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    109 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know wikis are critical to sharing knowledge within your organization! We’ve been slowly building capabilities to share information more easily with our focus on modern pages and web parts. And with that work, we’ve been adding some of the capabilities we hear you want when people refer to wikis (easily add links to other pages or content, add metadata to each page to help people find and categorize it, roll-up content based on that metadata to show groupings of like content, etc.) But we know this isn’t all that’s required to have a great wiki. Many people also want wiki linking syntax e.g. [[]], we don’t yet support that, but we do support ctrl/command + K from the text web part to search and find pages on your site. We’ll be working on adding wiki syntax shortly. We know you also need easy roll-up pages, maybe an index page,…

    Joel Chmiel supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base