Anonymous
My feedback
-
126 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
46 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
85 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
48 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
188 votes
We’ve reduced the height of the hero web part when in full width columns, but still maintain as much of the aspect ratio as possible. On a very large monitor this can still make the hero quite tall. Authors could also drag hero our of the full width column, into a one column layout (with gutters) , which significantly reduces the height. How would you imagine it should work differently in the full width, or is moving to a one column layout the right choice for reduced height? Thanks!
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
107 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
895 votestell us more ·
AdminSharePoint UserVoice Admin (SharePoint UserVoice Admin, Microsoft SharePoint) responded
Thanks for the feedback. It would helpful to know the specific scenarios where users aren’t able to get to the content they need.
We’ve observed that with sites shared publicly, or sites attached to a public Office365 Group, it’s not very meaningful to see every SharePoint Site a user can access, because there could be a huge number, most of which the user isn’t interested in.
Is the focus here more like “show me all sites I’m a member of”?
There is one comment that says search isn’t working, please open a support ticket for that.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
74 votesthinking about it · 3 comments · Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
168 votesthinking about it · 15 comments · Sites and Collaboration » Metadata · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
449 votes
Thanks you for the suggestion. We’ve discussed adding additional column layout options (e.g. 4 columns, the specific example provided by the initial suggester 25/50/25, etc.) If we wanted to keep pages consistent (so there aren’t 50 layouts), but allow additional flexibility, what would be the next three layout choices you’d add? Thanks!
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
830 votesin the plans · 51 comments · Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
412 votesthinking about it ·
AdminSharePoint UserVoice Admin (SharePoint UserVoice Admin, Microsoft SharePoint) responded
We’ve got this work item logged.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
312 votesthinking about it · 6 comments · Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
81 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
This is such a basic requirement... Why do visitors/reader be confused with unnecessary details..