SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 319 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  SharePoint Administration » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for making this suggestion. We don’t currently have plans to implement this, but would love to better understand the scenarios and need.

    Do you expect that people are deleting pages, or changing pages/content names frequently enough that they’re breaking other pages/content without knowing it?
    Is the site owner responsible for fixing that content or the authors/editors moving the content around?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    It wold be a great asset in administering sites and identify broken URL.s

  2. 195 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I totally agree. There are so many great features when you use Modern Pages, it is just the breadcrumbs that let it down.

  3. 412 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    49 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks you for the suggestion. We’ve discussed adding additional column layout options (e.g. 4 columns, the specific example provided by the initial suggester 25/50/25, etc.) If we wanted to keep pages consistent (so there aren’t 50 layouts), but allow additional flexibility, what would be the next three layout choices you’d add? Thanks!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base