Marc D Anderson

My feedback

  1. 153 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      6 comments  ·  SharePoint Dev Platform » SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Thanks for your feedback! We’re reviewing your suggestion. We are looking into closely on the input from the community around this and more specifically around the needed scenarios for the placeholders so that we could also potentially provide also specific customizers based on your requests – rather than just having an empty placeholder. Stay tuned!

      Marc D Anderson supported this idea  · 
    • 4 votes
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        I agree to the terms of service
        Signed in as (Sign out)

        We’ll send you updates on this idea

        Marc D Anderson supported this idea  · 
      • 16 votes
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          I agree to the terms of service
          Signed in as (Sign out)

          We’ll send you updates on this idea

          1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          Marc D Anderson shared this idea  · 
        • 63 votes
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            I agree to the terms of service
            Signed in as (Sign out)

            We’ll send you updates on this idea

            2 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Site Templates  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            Marc D Anderson commented  · 

            This is something I often add so-called "arbitrary JavaScript via injection" to do in existing list forms. If it were a built-in capability, that would be another reason for script in list forms to be off the table.

          • 17 votes
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              I agree to the terms of service
              Signed in as (Sign out)

              We’ll send you updates on this idea

              1 comment  ·  SharePoint Administration » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              Marc D Anderson supported this idea  · 
              Marc D Anderson commented  · 

              This is part of a larger issue around testing and forewarning about upcoming changes. A canary tenant is a nice idea, but having a change log to go along with it would be even better.

            • 244 votes
              Vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                I agree to the terms of service
                Signed in as (Sign out)
                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                Marc D Anderson supported this idea  · 
                Marc D Anderson commented  · 

                @André, I've found the behavior you saw in some circumstances. Maybe it's libraries versus lists? My error above is with a list, which for me is at least as common a situation as libraries.

                Either way, the behavior is not as expected, at least for me. I want to be able to get both the ID and Lookup value, just as I can with SOAP.

                Marc D Anderson commented  · 

                Bitten by this again today. Argh!!!

                Whenever I run into this, I fall back to SOAP calls, which Just Plain Work.

              • 129 votes
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  I agree to the terms of service
                  Signed in as (Sign out)

                  We’ll send you updates on this idea

                  7 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                  Marc D Anderson supported this idea  · 
                • 636 votes
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    I agree to the terms of service
                    Signed in as (Sign out)

                    We’ll send you updates on this idea

                    94 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                    The 5,000 item threshold is likely here to stay. We are aware that it takes awareness on both sides to get past this limitation: list owners have to build the right fields, indices, and indexed views so that end user queries can run successfully in large lists. And then, end users have to run the correct queries – they can’t just open the root of the list, they have to use a filtered, indexed view.

                    We want to pursue work that helps on both these ends – for example, proactively indexing more lists, making suggestions to list owners for views to create that will help end users, and helping end users at query time pick filters that will unblock their queries. Additionally, we want to increase our support for running more types of queries in large lists when an index is present – for example, instead of requiring an indexed…

                    Marc D Anderson commented  · 

                    Many times the only reason we need 5000+ items is to do some counts or sums. If those capabilities were there, it would cover a lot of ground. Other times we simply need more than 5000 items. Period.

                    This has always felt like an artificial limitation. In SharePoint 2007, there's no limit and I've built applications that retrieve 20000, 30000+ items using the SOAP services because I truly need to. This is the second decade of the 21st century. If the limit was 100,000 it might make more sense. 5000 is simply way too low. This is especially true since you guys tell us that lists con contain millions of items. If we stuff millions of items into a list and can't retrieve them, then it really defeats the purpose.

                    Marc D Anderson supported this idea  · 

                  Feedback and Knowledge Base