SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

jenny.bruce

My feedback

  1. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce shared this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce shared this idea  · 
  4. 200 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce shared this idea  · 
  6. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  7. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  8. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  9. 418 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    Desperately need a placeholder on left side (for languages with dominant left-to-right reading) of Communication sites. This would act as 'local' navigation for items that nest under site's existing visible horizontal navigation. Current approach of only having this navigation available in drop down is very poor usability; users cannot easily see related content nor orient themselves within the site without the clear visible signposts local navigation provides. While 'related pages' can be pulled onto the page canvas via highlighted content web part or other approaches, this is not the same as having proper 'local' navigation in a site.
    I also agree with Saravana about the need for placeholder for breadcrumbs as these provide similar signposts for users as 'local' navigation.

    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  10. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    Further to Simon's suggestion, metadata (e.g. Title, description which are OOB metadata) recorded in file properties in the library where images are stored should automatically populate image details when presented in gallery. It's crazy that this information must be re-entered manually for every picture included in the gallery.
    Ideally, the image gallery needs to work same/similar to document library or list web part, but using the cool gallery layout options rather than those available in doc library and list web part

    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  11. 157 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    In addition to or as an alternative to removing the 'See all' link would be to allow for the link to be customised to change the text, e.g. All news; All events + point the link to a page that has been set up to display the desired content (e.g. via a custom search). One key reason for wanting to customise the text is to help screen reader users who may have their reader set to just read out the links on the page. On a typical home page 'See all' maybe repeated multiple times if the page has Corporate news, local news, events, recent documents etc. Having 'See all repeated multiple times is as bad as having multiple 'click here' links on a page for screen reader users

  12. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Hub Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce shared this idea  · 
  13. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    Additional typical properties such as Photographer, date taken, location and expanded description should also come from file properties in library. Page creators should be able to choose which of these display 'on page' for users and also (optionally) as text 'on hover/focus'. While I'm sure clever folk have managed to come up with a JSON solution for this (I think Chris Kent might have created something similar) typical page creators don't know how to format with JSON and just want a web part that works 'plug and play'.

    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  14. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    It looks like this has been implemented as of May 2020. I'm on target release so not sure if this available generally yet.

  15. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  16. 45 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    Agree with Marjie this is needed. Site usage only shows figures for last 7 days (and then only for top 25 or so documents). If you are not religiously capturing this information weekly, it's impossible to know how your pages are tracking. Many of us are not permitted to use third party web stats solutions in our O365 tenancies and nor are do we have access to Office 365 admin where we just might be able to get data like this. This basic information should be available in the front end of SharePoint and be easy to discover and download for further analysis.

    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  17. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  18. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  19. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  20. 187 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    18 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Metadata  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    In response to the comment from the Sites Product Team about the ability to use CAML syntax - most of my users have absolutely no clue about how to form queries using text alone. They need WYSIWYG controls that allow them to structure their queries, choosing between AND, OR, or a combination thereof . Please prioritise this one to the top of the backlog

    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7

Feedback and Knowledge Base