SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

jenny.bruce

My feedback

  1. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce shared this idea  · 
  3. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  4. 177 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’ve reduced the height of the hero web part when in full width columns, but still maintain as much of the aspect ratio as possible. On a very large monitor this can still make the hero quite tall. Authors could also drag hero our of the full width column, into a one column layout (with gutters) , which significantly reduces the height. How would you imagine it should work differently in the full width, or is moving to a one column layout the right choice for reduced height? Thanks!

    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    Agree with many of the comments here - what would be really useful is a compact version that displays all five tiles when positioned in one of the columns in the two column layout. At present only one tile shows when you put the hero into a two column layout column. Users can of course see the other tiles if they use the forward and back buttons that display if they mouse over the hero. Problem is many of our users just won't be bothered to mouse over the hero tile to find more information.

  5. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce shared this idea  · 
  7. 76 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce shared this idea  · 
  9. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  10. 56 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    Alternatively, a JSON whiz might put together something that we can use in column formatting?

    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  11. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  12. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    I concur with this idea plus this needs to be extended to the ability to create unique views within folders. This is particularly important for Teams where by default documents for each channel in a team are stored in folders in the main document library of the underlying SharePoint site. The other option here would be for the architecture to be changed so that channels have separate document libraries rather than folders in the main document library

  13. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce shared this idea  · 
  14. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    I agree with this suggestion, but also think there should be an option for the vertical section to be positioned to the left of the rest of the page layout.

  15. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  16. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    Document library settings are available from the Settings button in the Office 365 bar. This is clearly not intuitive for users. It would probably be better if it were placed in the document library menu. Suggest it be placed under the 'more' (three dots) menu.

  17. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    Agree with this suggestion completely.
    Microsoft have made page creation really intuitive, but we still have to train our authors how to go through a series of (to them) complex steps so that they can delete their pages.
    For people with a long history with SharePoint, the process is 'obvious', but regrettably in my organisation we have very few people who have the necessary depth of experience.
    It's critical that deleting pages be as simple as creating them. If people delete by mistake, then our power users can help people retrieve things from the recycle bin.

    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  18. 155 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Hub Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    Agree with this suggestion whole heartedly - we moved from a centralised approach for our News to a distributed model at the suggestion of the local Microsoft staff. The fact that I can't set parameters around what news articles appear on my 'home' page is a serious limitation

    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  19. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 
  20. 1,894 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    143 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jenny.bruce commented  · 

    Could the Product team provide a link to the PnP Powershell solution? I couldn't find anything on the PnP Github repository. I could only find a Powershell solution on Stackexchange.
    My SharePoint Admin advised that if we used that Powershell solution I found on StackExchange we would lose our version history and page visits count - reasonably important pieces of data for our page.
    Essentially, we're no better of than if we just copied and pasted content from one page to another if we use PowerShell.

    jenny.bruce supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base