SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Gary

My feedback

  1. 751 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    87 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for submitting this suggestion and voting on it. We have two events/calendar solutions in modern pages today. The events web part has card based event tiles, powered by events lists. You can roll-up events from multiple sites into one page, but there isn’t currently a wall calendar view.

    Alternatively you can select to leverage a group calendar, and pull all of your events (including recurring events) from Exchange. This too is a compact card based view.

    While we understand a wall calendar view is desirable, we’re not working on it at this time.

    Gary supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    Modern lists now have a calendar view - Great! But the work is not done - the list web part also needs to supports the calendar view. The calendar view is not a nice to have, it is a need to have. "Not In Our Plans Right Now" is not consistent with other user voice responses - please keep the updates up to date.

  2. 112 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Metadata  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    Metadata is a cornerstone of SharePoint. If a column in a library is made mandatory and I open a Word document (desktop mode) I do see the 'Required Properties' banner at the top of the app but when I click on the Edit Properties I see: "No SharePoint Properties found". Like, really? Please allow a global setting to remove the information panel or fix this very fundamental functionality - it is really annoying.

    Gary supported this idea  · 
  3. 488 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gary supported this idea  · 
  4. 154 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Gary supported this idea  · 
  5. 574 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gary supported this idea  · 
  6. 58 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Hubs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
  7. 897 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    88 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    Indications are MS is investing in Planner but there is no feature parity between Planner and SP Task list. These are different products. My clients use SP Task lists regularly for task management. Unless significant enhancements can be made to Planner then modernizing Task lists is the responsible thing to do.

  8. 66 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    This is a big problem if users regularly share content and then use the copy link function to generate static links on pages to these content items. If the unique permissions are removed on those items then the links are broken. Microsoft, please finish designing and building the permissions infrastructure - frankly, it is currently a mess.

  9. 415 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
  10. 18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gary supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    I have several SB clients, they don't understand Sharing and use this randomly which creates many unique permission scenarios. Recent changes to the site permissions caused a trickle down effect that corrupts permissions where there were unique permissions. This creates an Admin nighmare. Microsoft, please fix this, it is broken.

  11. 171 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gary commented  · 

    The sharepoint.aspx page should be optional or configurable. Please change this - I am running out of excuses to give my clients as to why this cannot be made more intuitive.

    Gary supported this idea  · 
  12. 1,915 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    338 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    In modern pages, we open links within SharePoint in the same tab by default, and external links in a new tab. In the text web part, users can specify to open links in a new tab, but that isn’t the default behavior. Similarly, for navigation links, they follow the same rule (within SharePoint, same tab, external to SharePoint in a new tab). This is true of the modern web parts that support linking as well (hero, quick links, images, etc.) This is the pattern we’ve adopted for consistency.

    After reviewing other areas of modern sites, like the site pages library, document libraries, lists, site contents, etc. we did find some different opening behaviors which we’ll review and resolve.

    Can you help us understand if this pattern isn’t meeting your expectation, if we have some inconsistencies within modern pages we’ve missed, or if it’s the other areas of modern sites where…

    Gary supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base