Erik
My feedback
-
19 votesErik
supported this idea
·
-
4,648 votes
Thank you everyone for your feedback on this item. We recognize this is a valuable feature and are looking at ways we can address it. We do not have a timeline to share at this point.
Erik
supported this idea
·
-
142 votesErik
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesErik
supported this idea
·
-
433 votesErik
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteErik
shared this idea
·
-
22 votesErik
supported this idea
·
-
680 votesthinking about it · 113 comments · Sites and Collaboration » General · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Erik
supported this idea
·
-
187 votesErik
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes2 comments · Sites and Collaboration » Workflow, Flow, and PowerApps integration · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Erik
commented
I find it rather disturbing that no decent alternative to the discontinued slide library hasn't been offered.
So many organizations wasting so much time in reinventing the wheel over and over because of this sorely missing feature.
Erik
supported this idea
·
-
349 votes
We are thinking about a plan for editing the highlighted content display fields, but do not currently have a timeline for this feature
An error occurred while saving the comment Erik
commented
It is possible to make Highlighted Content webpart display filenames instead of title. By editing the title property in the search schema settings and promote "Basic10" property (which for some reason represents filename) to the top.
However, this "fix" has negative side-effects on other webparts (e.g. news webpart not displaying the news headline, but instead something like "news-file-name.aspx"
The possibility to tailor what is being displayed (texts as well as the image) would be really useful
Erik
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesErik
shared this idea
·
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Erik
commented
Seriously, only 2 votes after this long. This idea should have been implemented years ago. Using the current filter of any view in a document library would greatly improve the whole experience with metadata.
To me the lack of votes here is merely an indication of this uservoice format being dysfunctional
Erik
supported this idea
·
-
82 votesErik
supported this idea
·
-
47 votesErik
supported this idea
·
-
113 votesErik
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesErik
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesErik
supported this idea
·
-
65 votesErik
supported this idea
·
-
46 votesErik
supported this idea
·
Could anyone from the SharePoint dev-team explain why this bug is not fixed yet?