Anonymous
My feedback
-
4,824 votes
Thanks for your feedback! Just a note to let you know that we’re building your suggestion now. We plan to increase availability to this feature as we continue improving the tech, and ensuring a smooth experience across Office 365 following the URL changes in SharePoint Online.
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Microsoft, please fix this. Any update? Thank you,
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Hello Microsoft, we really need this feature for our business, as like most businesses we go through a rebranding from time to time and having the old incorrect name on our site or products reflects poorly on our IT team. Please fix this or allow for alternate access mappings, as this could be done with the on-prem SharePoint. Thank you,
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Seriously how is this not fixed by now, how many years do we have to wait? Organizations re-brand! Come on Microsoft!
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
When is Microsoft going to fix this?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
100% required for our business to continue using Microsoft services.
What is the due date for the completion of this? Thank you.An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Needed due to company re-branding. Any update Microsoft?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Our company this year decided to investigate ERP and CRM for our business. Since Microsoft has not been able to correct the tenant rename feature for Office 365 we are not confident Microsoft will be a good partner for other products.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Any update Microsoft? We really need this to continue to use your platform, it is getting to a point where enough executives are going to get feed up with the fact that our site does not match our company branding. This is the top-requested feature on SharePoint user voice. Please make it happen. Thank you,
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Any update Microsoft? We really need this and it's the top requested feature on SharePoint user voice. Thank you,
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
I really can't believe this hasn't been done yet. Our Microsoft evangelist said it was in the pipeline and you were "working on it" in Jan 2018. Last update was over 6 months ago...
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Microsoft, any update on this? We need this for rebranding and acquisitions.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Our previous IT manager registered our domain with a typo, really want to fix this, as it makes us look bad. Been hoping to change this for years now, a Tenant to Tenant migration is not a viable option. Please fix this or allow us to do an alternate access mapping like we could with onsite SharePoint. Thank you,
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
What is the update on this! Please stop developing anything else for Office 365 and work on fixing this for your customers.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
When will we be able to rename our Microsoft Tenant ID? Please stop all other development of "features" and give us this basic thing that should have been in the original product design. I can't believe this is still not been completed.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
It's been another month, hoping for an update on this?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Microsoft can you confirm if it is true that we will be able to rename our https://tenant.sharepoint.com name soon? What is the ETA on this feature?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
This was original requested by users in 2016. Original response post says your developers have been working on this since Jan 3rd 2018, then a follow up March 7th. Are you guys able to make this available anytime soon? Thank you,
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Microsoft should just allow us the ability to add vanity URLs, using the cname of our own domain, example sharepoint.mydomain.com
This is a common feature of both free and paid web services.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Microsoft PLEASE fix this issue. How is it taking so long to fix this?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Hi Microsoft, with all of the great things we see at Build 2019, how is it this has not yet been fixed?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Really need this fixed! Any update Microsoft? Thanks.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
How is this not fixed yet? Please update us on the status.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Almost every multi-tenant web service in the world has this feature, including Google Sites, Facebook, Zendesk, GoDaddy, Wix, etc. Should be that we can create a DNS Cname and point it to our SharePoint site and make the URL what every we want, example intranet.mydomain.com
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
This is the most basic feature that most multi-tenant web based services allow (Google, Yahoo, Facebook). Hopefully Microsoft will resolve this soon.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Really need this Microsoft!
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Please update us on when this will be fixed? Thank you,
-
1,247 votesthinking about it · 41 comments · Sites and Collaboration » General · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,583 votesworking on it ·
AdminSharePoint UserVoice Admin
(SharePoint UserVoice Admin, Microsoft SharePoint)
responded
Quick update on this suggestion. We are still working on this with MS Teams. We don’t have an ETA to share still.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
137 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
I'd love to be able to remove headers, remove side navigation and have more columns.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
106 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
OMG, I'm always deleting the default Shared Docs and creating a folder called just docs in it's place.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
154 votes
We’ve reduced the height of the hero web part when in full width columns, but still maintain as much of the aspect ratio as possible. On a very large monitor this can still make the hero quite tall. Authors could also drag hero our of the full width column, into a one column layout (with gutters) , which significantly reduces the height. How would you imagine it should work differently in the full width, or is moving to a one column layout the right choice for reduced height? Thanks!
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
271 votes
We’re currently working on this feature now. You’ll be able to specify when your modern page actually gets published (date/time).
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
197 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
225 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Microsoft, please give us the ability to do this.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
242 votes
Today you can add metadata to modern pages and news. Also the news web part currently supports filtering news by metadata, as long as the source of the content is the current site.
We’re working to enable this same filtering across sites right now.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
It would really be nice to schedule news items with post date and expiration date.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
260 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
325 votes
Thank you for everyone’s feedback around the use of white space on modern pages. We are continually looking for ways to refine our designs and the use of white space is an important part of this. While the custom control of sections or the custom control of columns is not likely to happen, there could be other optimizations we will be thinking about in the future. Thank you.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Agreed, we wish we could have 4 or 5 columns, hide the side navigation, get ride of the large headers that take up so much space. Please, Microsoft make this more customizable!
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Really need more flexibility over all with site design and margins. I'd love to be able to have 4 column vs. 3 on a page layout or be able to hide the quick launch area or move the search without having to pick a whole different template (team site vs comm. site).
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
313 votes
We are working on this looking at all options – things admins want and things end users want
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Please give us MUCH more customizability of the header, it would be nice to not only be able to choose small or larger header, but to even be able to remove it, as in most cases it's a waste of space, especially since we already have our logo in the Office theme header that sits on top of the SharePoint header.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
399 votes
Its already supported to remove the Feedback button. Set-SPOTenant -UserVoiceForFeedbackEnabled:$false.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
323 votes
We’ll be updating the Image gallery web part on modern pages shortly to display images dynamically from a document library, if you have that library backed by a CDN.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
355 votesthinking about it ·AdminSharePoint UserVoice Admin
(SharePoint UserVoice Admin, Microsoft SharePoint)
responded
Thanks for your suggestion. We’re evaluating technical options for this feature. No guarantees or timelines just yet – but this is something we think would be very useful.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
3-4 layers of grouping would be really nice, as there are a lot of use cases for this. However, I've found grouping in modern pages to be really poor for performance, where in classic lists this is not the case. Please help fix this Microsoft.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
845 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
+1 to Matthew Cook's suggestions.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
865 votes
This request is still in our web part backlog, but we’d love some more information. As some replies to this request have pointed out, when hovering over a person in SharePoint, Teams, or Outlook, you do see an Org Chart displayed. When we’ve spoken with customers in the past, our feeling was that more customization was required to display this on a page. Help us understand your needs. If we gave you the option to display this auto generated Org Chart on a page, with no customization options is that enough? If not, what customizations do you need? E.g. I need to be able to hide some of the people in the team, even though they’re in AAD. I need to rearrange and put some people in different physical locations on the layout to show their relationships better. I need to change their title from what’s in AAD,…
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
AAD has all of the information for every employee and manager. It would really be nice to have a full OrgChart web part to be able to browse the whole OrgChart for a small company. Thanks.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,146 votesworking on it ·AdminSharePoint UserVoice Admin
(SharePoint UserVoice Admin, Microsoft SharePoint)
responded
As per the Message Center Post MC187289 we have started to roll out Site Swap. This is a new PowerShell cmdlet Invoke-SPOSiteSwap that will enable you to swap your existing root site with a Communication Site. For further information please refer to https://aka.ms/SiteSwap.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Has this been released yet?
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,532 votes
In modern pages, we open links within SharePoint in the same tab by default, and external links in a new tab. In the text web part, users can specify to open links in a new tab, but that isn’t the default behavior. Similarly, for navigation links, they follow the same rule (within SharePoint, same tab, external to SharePoint in a new tab). This is true of the modern web parts that support linking as well (hero, quick links, images, etc.) This is the pattern we’ve adopted for consistency.
After reviewing other areas of modern sites, like the site pages library, document libraries, lists, site contents, etc. we did find some different opening behaviors which we’ll review and resolve.
Can you help us understand if this pattern isn’t meeting your expectation, if we have some inconsistencies within modern pages we’ve missed, or if it’s the other areas of modern sites where…
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
We should be given the option of how we want the link to open when we create it, either in the current tab or new tab. This has been a feature of so many web applications for so long, I'm shocked it doesn't work in SharePoint Online.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
Microsoft, please give us a status update on this, which is the number 1 requested feature in Office 365 and SharePoint. Thank you.