SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 4,377 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    536 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for your feedback! Just a note to let you know that we’re building your suggestion now. We plan to increase availability to this feature as we continue improving the tech, and ensuring a smooth experience across Office 365 following the URL changes in SharePoint Online.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Needed due to company re-branding. Any update Microsoft?

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Our company this year decided to investigate ERP and CRM for our business. Since Microsoft has not been able to correct the tenant rename feature for Office 365 we are not confident Microsoft will be a good partner for other products.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Any update Microsoft? We really need this to continue to use your platform, it is getting to a point where enough executives are going to get feed up with the fact that our site does not match our company branding. This is the top-requested feature on SharePoint user voice. Please make it happen. Thank you,

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Any update Microsoft? We really need this and it's the top requested feature on SharePoint user voice. Thank you,

    Anonymous commented  · 

    I really can't believe this hasn't been done yet. Our Microsoft evangelist said it was in the pipeline and you were "working on it" in Jan 2018. Last update was over 6 months ago...

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft, any update on this? We need this for rebranding and acquisitions.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Our previous IT manager registered our domain with a typo, really want to fix this, as it makes us look bad. Been hoping to change this for years now, a Tenant to Tenant migration is not a viable option. Please fix this or allow us to do an alternate access mapping like we could with onsite SharePoint. Thank you,

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    What is the update on this! Please stop developing anything else for Office 365 and work on fixing this for your customers.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    When will we be able to rename our Microsoft Tenant ID? Please stop all other development of "features" and give us this basic thing that should have been in the original product design. I can't believe this is still not been completed.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    It's been another month, hoping for an update on this?

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft can you confirm if it is true that we will be able to rename our https://tenant.sharepoint.com name soon? What is the ETA on this feature?

    Anonymous commented  · 

    This was original requested by users in 2016. Original response post says your developers have been working on this since Jan 3rd 2018, then a follow up March 7th. Are you guys able to make this available anytime soon? Thank you,

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft should just allow us the ability to add vanity URLs, using the cname of our own domain, example sharepoint.mydomain.com

    This is a common feature of both free and paid web services.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft PLEASE fix this issue. How is it taking so long to fix this?

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hi Microsoft, with all of the great things we see at Build 2019, how is it this has not yet been fixed?

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Really need this fixed! Any update Microsoft? Thanks.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    How is this not fixed yet? Please update us on the status.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Almost every multi-tenant web service in the world has this feature, including Google Sites, Facebook, Zendesk, GoDaddy, Wix, etc. Should be that we can create a DNS Cname and point it to our SharePoint site and make the URL what every we want, example intranet.mydomain.com

    Anonymous commented  · 

    This is the most basic feature that most multi-tenant web based services allow (Google, Yahoo, Facebook). Hopefully Microsoft will resolve this soon.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Really need this Microsoft!

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Please update us on when this will be fixed? Thank you,

  2. 1,142 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    thinking about it  ·  40 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 2,306 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    174 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 109 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I'd love to be able to remove headers, remove side navigation and have more columns.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 101 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    OMG, I'm always deleting the default Shared Docs and creating a folder called just docs in it's place.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 135 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’ve reduced the height of the hero web part when in full width columns, but still maintain as much of the aspect ratio as possible. On a very large monitor this can still make the hero quite tall. Authors could also drag hero our of the full width column, into a one column layout (with gutters) , which significantly reduces the height. How would you imagine it should work differently in the full width, or is moving to a one column layout the right choice for reduced height? Thanks!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 221 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    18 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 182 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    31 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 198 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft, please give us the ability to do this.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 212 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    It would really be nice to schedule news items with post date and expiration date.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 219 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 258 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for everyone’s feedback around the use of white space on modern pages. We are continually looking for ways to refine our designs and the use of white space is an important part of this. While the custom control of sections or the custom control of columns is not likely to happen, there could be other optimizations we will be thinking about in the future. Thank you.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Agreed, we wish we could have 4 or 5 columns, hide the side navigation, get ride of the large headers that take up so much space. Please, Microsoft make this more customizable!

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Really need more flexibility over all with site design and margins. I'd love to be able to have 4 column vs. 3 on a page layout or be able to hide the quick launch area or move the search without having to pick a whole different template (team site vs comm. site).

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 264 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    31 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Please give us MUCH more customizability of the header, it would be nice to not only be able to choose small or larger header, but to even be able to remove it, as in most cases it's a waste of space, especially since we already have our logo in the Office theme header that sits on top of the SharePoint header.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 307 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 300 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 326 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    3-4 layers of grouping would be really nice, as there are a lot of use cases for this. However, I've found grouping in modern pages to be really poor for performance, where in classic lists this is not the case. Please help fix this Microsoft.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 548 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    38 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    As of March 2019 this feature is available to all users of the list/library webparts on modern publishing pages, and to 50% of First Release users in the full page lists/library app. We are continuing to roll this out to all users, but it’s part of a collection of other features, and we have paused rollout a few times to address requests and changes in those other features.

    Note this feature is available only in SharePoint Online

    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree with the statement that the "Modern SharePoint List" experience has been extremely frustrating with constant unnecessary changes that break or abandon such basic functionality that we've gotten used to.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    When will this be available to all users in SharePoint Online? Thank you.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  18. 729 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    46 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    +1 to Matthew Cook's suggestions.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 757 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    70 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This request is still in our web part backlog, but we’d love some more information. As some replies to this request have pointed out, when hovering over a person in SharePoint, Teams, or Outlook, you do see an Org Chart displayed. When we’ve spoken with customers in the past, our feeling was that more customization was required to display this on a page. Help us understand your needs. If we gave you the option to display this auto generated Org Chart on a page, with no customization options is that enough? If not, what customizations do you need? E.g. I need to be able to hide some of the people in the team, even though they’re in AAD. I need to rearrange and put some people in different physical locations on the layout to show their relationships better. I need to change their title from what’s in AAD,…

    Anonymous commented  · 

    AAD has all of the information for every employee and manager. It would really be nice to have a full OrgChart web part to be able to browse the whole OrgChart for a small company. Thanks.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 1,102 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    71 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Has this been released yet?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base