SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 568 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    58 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Looking forward to having this feature soon.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 151 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Every other website tool in the world allows you to change the site URL to whatever CNAME you want in a domain that you own. Google sites, Wix, Yahoo sites, GoDaddy, Network Solutions can all do this. How is it that Microsoft can not figure this out?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 5,754 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    720 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Providing the ability to scale from renaming individual sites, to all sites within a SharePoint tenant, while ensuring a consistent user experience across M365 is a complex problem. We have been working hard on this long-awaited feature and are currently validating this with a subset of customers in a closed (no longer accepting nominations) Private Preview Program. As we consolidate their feedback, we will provide another update in the next few months.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Wow, still no fix for the #1 requested item on SharePoint forums? After how many years? Does Microsoft even care about its customers? Please, please, please allow us to use whatever domain cname we want for our Microsoft SharePoint URL. How is it GoDaddy, Yahoo, Google, Wix can figure this out, but Microsoft can not?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft, we've been following this ticket for years and it seems to be the number one SharePoint feature request. Please give us an update to the status of when this will be available? Thank you,

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft, please give us a status update on this, which is the number 1 requested feature in Office 365 and SharePoint. Thank you.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft, please fix this. Any update? Thank you,

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hello Microsoft, we really need this feature for our business, as like most businesses we go through a rebranding from time to time and having the old incorrect name on our site or products reflects poorly on our IT team. Please fix this or allow for alternate access mappings, as this could be done with the on-prem SharePoint. Thank you,

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Seriously how is this not fixed by now, how many years do we have to wait? Organizations re-brand! Come on Microsoft!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    When is Microsoft going to fix this?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    100% required for our business to continue using Microsoft services.
    What is the due date for the completion of this? Thank you.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Needed due to company re-branding. Any update Microsoft?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Our company this year decided to investigate ERP and CRM for our business. Since Microsoft has not been able to correct the tenant rename feature for Office 365 we are not confident Microsoft will be a good partner for other products.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Any update Microsoft? We really need this to continue to use your platform, it is getting to a point where enough executives are going to get feed up with the fact that our site does not match our company branding. This is the top-requested feature on SharePoint user voice. Please make it happen. Thank you,

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Any update Microsoft? We really need this and it's the top requested feature on SharePoint user voice. Thank you,

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I really can't believe this hasn't been done yet. Our Microsoft evangelist said it was in the pipeline and you were "working on it" in Jan 2018. Last update was over 6 months ago...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft, any update on this? We need this for rebranding and acquisitions.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Our previous IT manager registered our domain with a typo, really want to fix this, as it makes us look bad. Been hoping to change this for years now, a Tenant to Tenant migration is not a viable option. Please fix this or allow us to do an alternate access mapping like we could with onsite SharePoint. Thank you,

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    What is the update on this! Please stop developing anything else for Office 365 and work on fixing this for your customers.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    When will we be able to rename our Microsoft Tenant ID? Please stop all other development of "features" and give us this basic thing that should have been in the original product design. I can't believe this is still not been completed.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    It's been another month, hoping for an update on this?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft can you confirm if it is true that we will be able to rename our https://tenant.sharepoint.com name soon? What is the ETA on this feature?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This was original requested by users in 2016. Original response post says your developers have been working on this since Jan 3rd 2018, then a follow up March 7th. Are you guys able to make this available anytime soon? Thank you,

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft should just allow us the ability to add vanity URLs, using the cname of our own domain, example sharepoint.mydomain.com

    This is a common feature of both free and paid web services.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft PLEASE fix this issue. How is it taking so long to fix this?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hi Microsoft, with all of the great things we see at Build 2019, how is it this has not yet been fixed?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Really need this fixed! Any update Microsoft? Thanks.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    How is this not fixed yet? Please update us on the status.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Almost every multi-tenant web service in the world has this feature, including Google Sites, Facebook, Zendesk, GoDaddy, Wix, etc. Should be that we can create a DNS Cname and point it to our SharePoint site and make the URL what every we want, example intranet.mydomain.com

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This is the most basic feature that most multi-tenant web based services allow (Google, Yahoo, Facebook). Hopefully Microsoft will resolve this soon.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Really need this Microsoft!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Please update us on when this will be fixed? Thank you,

  4. 415 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    50 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks you for the suggestion. We’ve discussed adding additional column layout options (e.g. 4 columns, the specific example provided by the initial suggester 25/50/25, etc.) If we wanted to keep pages consistent (so there aren’t 50 layouts), but allow additional flexibility, what would be the next three layout choices you’d add? Thanks!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I really want less header/side wasted space. It would be really nice to have 4 columns with the various layouts described and ability to expand them to be the full page size. Thank you.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,444 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    thinking about it  ·  44 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 3,040 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    238 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 180 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I'd love to be able to remove headers, remove side navigation and have more columns.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 119 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    OMG, I'm always deleting the default Shared Docs and creating a folder called just docs in it's place.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 177 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’ve reduced the height of the hero web part when in full width columns, but still maintain as much of the aspect ratio as possible. On a very large monitor this can still make the hero quite tall. Authors could also drag hero our of the full width column, into a one column layout (with gutters) , which significantly reduces the height. How would you imagine it should work differently in the full width, or is moving to a one column layout the right choice for reduced height? Thanks!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 320 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    29 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 226 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    33 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 304 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    It would really be nice to schedule news items with post date and expiration date.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 350 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    18 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 507 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    36 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for everyone’s feedback around the use of white space on modern pages. We are continually looking for ways to refine our designs and the use of white space is an important part of this. While the custom control of sections or the custom control of columns is not likely to happen, there could be other optimizations we will be thinking about in the future. Thank you.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Agreed, we wish we could have 4 or 5 columns, hide the side navigation, get ride of the large headers that take up so much space. Please, Microsoft make this more customizable!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Really need more flexibility over all with site design and margins. I'd love to be able to have 4 column vs. 3 on a page layout or be able to hide the quick launch area or move the search without having to pick a whole different template (team site vs comm. site).

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 455 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    53 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Please give us MUCH more customizability of the header, it would be nice to not only be able to choose small or larger header, but to even be able to remove it, as in most cases it's a waste of space, especially since we already have our logo in the Office theme header that sits on top of the SharePoint header.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 361 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 424 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    3-4 layers of grouping would be really nice, as there are a lot of use cases for this. However, I've found grouping in modern pages to be really poor for performance, where in classic lists this is not the case. Please help fix this Microsoft.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  18. 1,075 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    69 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    +1 to Matthew Cook's suggestions.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 1,807 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    303 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    In modern pages, we open links within SharePoint in the same tab by default, and external links in a new tab. In the text web part, users can specify to open links in a new tab, but that isn’t the default behavior. Similarly, for navigation links, they follow the same rule (within SharePoint, same tab, external to SharePoint in a new tab). This is true of the modern web parts that support linking as well (hero, quick links, images, etc.) This is the pattern we’ve adopted for consistency.

    After reviewing other areas of modern sites, like the site pages library, document libraries, lists, site contents, etc. we did find some different opening behaviors which we’ll review and resolve.

    Can you help us understand if this pattern isn’t meeting your expectation, if we have some inconsistencies within modern pages we’ve missed, or if it’s the other areas of modern sites where…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    We should be given the option of how we want the link to open when we create it, either in the current tab or new tab. This has been a feature of so many web applications for so long, I'm shocked it doesn't work in SharePoint Online.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 2,190 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    228 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are continuing to make our large list experiences better, please keep the feedback coming.

    Spring 2018 update:
    - We now support being able to manually add indexes to lists of any size (increased from lists up to 20,000 items previously).
    - Starting with the February release of the Office 365 Excel client, you will be able to export your full list instead of getting cut off part of the way through.

    What we are working on now:
    - Predictive indexing will start to work for lists larger than 20,000 items so your views will automatically cause the right indexes to be added to your lists.

    In our backlog:
    - Being able to index/sort/filter by lookup column types (like person, lookup or managed metadata columns) without being throttled.
    - Making sure that our REST APIs support querying in ways that will guarantee that the call will not be throttled.

    For…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Please fix this Microsoft.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base