SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Jeff

My feedback

  1. 4,377 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    536 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for your feedback! Just a note to let you know that we’re building your suggestion now. We plan to increase availability to this feature as we continue improving the tech, and ensuring a smooth experience across Office 365 following the URL changes in SharePoint Online.

    Jeff supported this idea  · 
  2. 302 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    A consolidated admin view of where published content types are being used is still being evaluated, but for folks voting for the related use case of “better creation and management of content types” please refer to site designs (aka.ms/spsitedesigns) as a modern mechanism to create/apply content types to site libraries. We are also looking at how this could be more easily supported from hub sites.

    Jeff supported this idea  · 
  3. 893 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    89 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know wikis are critical to sharing knowledge within your organization! We’ve been slowly building capabilities to share information more easily with our focus on modern pages and web parts. And with that work, we’ve been adding some of the capabilities we hear you want when people refer to wikis (easily add links to other pages or content, add metadata to each page to help people find and categorize it, roll-up content based on that metadata to show groupings of like content, etc.) But we know this isn’t all that’s required to have a great wiki. Many people also want wiki linking syntax e.g. [[]], we don’t yet support that, but we do support ctrl/command + K from the text web part to search and find pages on your site. We’ll be working on adding wiki syntax shortly. We know you also need easy roll-up pages, maybe an index page,…

    Jeff commented  · 

    +1 Wiki linking syntax [[]] or some type of linking method
    also
    +1 Templates for standard formatting/styles and structure

    Jeff supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,086 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    115 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff supported this idea  · 
  5. 2,326 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    239 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff commented  · 

    Users find the current process very difficult and are thus not properly saving files back online. SharePoint cannot SHARE effectively if the system does not have such basic functions and users circumvent the system. Please address this issue.

    Jeff commented  · 

    You can do it!

    Jeff supported this idea  · 
  6. 63 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff supported this idea  · 
  7. 410 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    58 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jeff commented  · 

    Use cases: Recurring team events such as ask me anything, office hours, open labs, Healthy snack Fridays. Visitors of a site are not members of a group.

    Jeff commented  · 

    Not everyone who needs to see calendar content is a member of a group. Some sites are open to a wide group and managed on an AD level. If you added everyone to a group you run the risks of users having access to items they shouldn't such as planner. Clearly you understanding recurring events is needed as you built it for groups. What I think your not understanding is that the group calendar does not solve the problem due to the challenges with access as just noted.

    Jeff supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base