SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Joseph Dunphy

My feedback

  1. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joseph Dunphy commented  · 

    I work to assist our teams in better optimizing the use of their tools and across the board folks prefer the default of opening in the client app versus the web client -- it's too bad that you can't do the same for search that you can do for the document library -- this limitation drove one of our teams to move to only operating using the OneDrive client (for the file viewer view) so when they search, and then open the document, it'll go into the client application like they want.

    Word Online by default does not show the comments which our Doctors and Pharmacists had leveraged frequently in Google Docs and since migrating over the web just adds extra clicks no one cares to take when we can skip using the SharePoint site all together and just use the OneDrive client and SharePoint it as a file repository and get the file opening function to work as they want it. I want to push more uses of SharePoint but using it means making the task-oriented work that they do the most of more tedious to actually complete.

    Please consider allowing us to change this default behavior (and make actual UI menus to turn this off/on) for a site collection!

    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  2. 80 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joseph Dunphy commented  · 

    This is actually a really valuable enhancement request to our larger company. We're moving over to SharePoint from JIVE and one of the benefits of writing org-wide communications is the ability to @mention people relevant to the news as it makes it easier to connect with those people -- currently there is no meaningful way to do this with SharePoint news posts -- it hurts our teams' adoption rates trying to leverage SharePoint is a wider form of communication when Outlook makes it easier to call out people who have done great work in an email

  3. 1,117 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    115 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  4. 260 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  SharePoint Administration » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  5. 332 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Communication Sites  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joseph Dunphy commented  · 

    Use case: I built a communication site that we're designing to be community-driven news curation resource where people from a lot of different business areas can share 'tech-tips' that are less focused on what you can do with a resource (SharePoint, Flow, Teams, Smartsheet, Asana, etc.) and more about how people are using it in their specific job area to add more contextual information on how to apply the resource. I want to be able to categorize the news posts and leverage those categories to map articles with category "x" are sent to approvers in group "y"

    This would really help engagement by allowing each business area to govern their own articles.

    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  6. 965 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    161 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,172 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    73 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  8. 768 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  9. 1,253 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    117 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know wikis are critical to sharing knowledge within your organization! We’ve been slowly building capabilities to share information more easily with our focus on modern pages and web parts. And with that work, we’ve been adding some of the capabilities we hear you want when people refer to wikis (easily add links to other pages or content, add metadata to each page to help people find and categorize it, roll-up content based on that metadata to show groupings of like content, etc.) But we know this isn’t all that’s required to have a great wiki. Many people also want wiki linking syntax e.g. [[]], we don’t yet support that, but we do support ctrl/command + K from the text web part to search and find pages on your site. We’ll be working on adding wiki syntax shortly. We know you also need easy roll-up pages, maybe an index page,…

    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  10. 1,521 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    thinking about it  ·  46 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,982 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    143 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  12. 2,373 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    246 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are continuing to make our large list experiences better, please keep the feedback coming.

    Spring 2018 update:
    - We now support being able to manually add indexes to lists of any size (increased from lists up to 20,000 items previously).
    - Starting with the February release of the Office 365 Excel client, you will be able to export your full list instead of getting cut off part of the way through.

    What we are working on now:
    - Predictive indexing will start to work for lists larger than 20,000 items so your views will automatically cause the right indexes to be added to your lists.

    In our backlog:
    - Being able to index/sort/filter by lookup column types (like person, lookup or managed metadata columns) without being throttled.
    - Making sure that our REST APIs support querying in ways that will guarantee that the call will not be throttled.

    For…

    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  13. 4,641 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    424 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  14. 3,201 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    252 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 
  15. 6,168 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    784 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Sites Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are continuing to validate this long-awaited feature in a Private Preview Program with a subset of customers. Although feedback has been very positive we have identified a few things that we still need to address before we start making this more generally available. We appreciate that this is taking time, however providing a consistent user experience across M365 that continues to function as expected is a complex problem. We will provide another update within the next few months.

    Joseph Dunphy supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base