SharePoint
Feedback by UserVoice

Andy O

My feedback

  1. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andy O commented  · 

    And also add the option to scale the sizes of the carousel

  2. 50 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andy O commented  · 

    Your new options here still leave the title shown.
    We want the option to completely hide the page title!

  3. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Dev Platform » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy O shared this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Dev Platform » SharePoint Framework  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy O shared this idea  · 
  5. 1,768 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    300 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    In modern pages, we open links within SharePoint in the same tab by default, and external links in a new tab. In the text web part, users can specify to open links in a new tab, but that isn’t the default behavior. Similarly, for navigation links, they follow the same rule (within SharePoint, same tab, external to SharePoint in a new tab). This is true of the modern web parts that support linking as well (hero, quick links, images, etc.) This is the pattern we’ve adopted for consistency.

    After reviewing other areas of modern sites, like the site pages library, document libraries, lists, site contents, etc. we did find some different opening behaviors which we’ll review and resolve.

    Can you help us understand if this pattern isn’t meeting your expectation, if we have some inconsistencies within modern pages we’ve missed, or if it’s the other areas of modern sites where…

    Andy O supported this idea  · 
  6. 312 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  SharePoint Administration » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for making this suggestion. We don’t currently have plans to implement this, but would love to better understand the scenarios and need.

    Do you expect that people are deleting pages, or changing pages/content names frequently enough that they’re breaking other pages/content without knowing it?
    Is the site owner responsible for fixing that content or the authors/editors moving the content around?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andy O commented  · 

    During migration from On Prem to SPOL we find a lot of links will be broken after migration. In navigation, in pages and in documents themselves. It would be a very handy tool to be able to produce a report of broken links so the site owners can easliy idenitfy and repair them.

    It would be even more handy if the function could also batch fix broken links.

    Andy O supported this idea  · 
  7. 41 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andy O commented  · 

    Boom it;s done? Not really. It is only visible in IE not in Edge.
    Can it be added to Edge as well?

  8. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Dev Platform » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy O shared this idea  · 
  9. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SharePoint Dev Platform » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy O shared this idea  · 
  10. 790 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    81 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Lists  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andy O commented  · 

    What I experience when migrating from On Prem to Online the data in the title field of tasklists is replaced by id numbers in modern experience. In Classic the data is still there, so users have to use the classic version in this case. Can you fix that as well while picking up this uservoice or offer a workaround (we migrate with ShareGate)?

    Andy O supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,790 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    133 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy O supported this idea  · 
  12. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy O supported this idea  · 
  13. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy O supported this idea  · 
  14. 52 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy O supported this idea  · 
  15. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy O supported this idea  · 
  16. 171 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Modern Pages  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Today modern pages support picking one of three colors derived from the site theme (soft, neautral, strong). We likely won’t be investing in the option to add arbitrary other colors as a section background, violating the site’s theme. For the other suggestions, please open a unique uservoice suggestion (e.g. support section background images)

    Andy O supported this idea  · 
  17. 563 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    66 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Document Libraries  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andy O supported this idea  · 
  18. 170 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Sites and Collaboration » Web Parts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andy O commented  · 

    Need this, need this.. Can not understand why this is not in.

Feedback and Knowledge Base